Marie: I just checked out a video short RAS linked, which should remind you that Trump is in coganadative (phonetic spelling, or the best I could do at approximating a phonetic spelling) decline. Scrolling through the comments about the video, I found this old chestnut that gives the same impression as RAS's video (though lacks the unwitting self-referential element), but it also has the benefit of being LOL funny::
Ann Marimow & Pam Belluck of the New York Times: “A manufacturer of the abortion pill mifepristone asked the Supreme Court on Saturday to immediately restore full access to the medication, putting the contentious issue of abortion back before the justices in an election year. The request came after a lower court on Friday temporarily restricted abortion providers nationwide from prescribing the pills by telemedicine and sending them to patients by mail. That process is one of the main ways women seeking abortions have obtained the medication in recent years. If the order on Friday by a federal appeals court is upheld, it could sow confusion and upend a major avenue for abortion access across the country — not just in states with abortion bans. About one-fourth of abortions in the United States are now provided through telemedicine.... The Trump administration has defended the F.D.A. in court, but has not said in this case, or in public statements, whether it supports keeping in place the regulations that allow for pills to be mailed.” ~~~
~~~ Marie: I don't know how these emergency requests to the Supreme Court work, but if their first stop is the desk of the justice in charge of the circuit that issued the order, that would be the Fifth Circuit, and the justice who oversees the Fifth Circuit is the Inquisitor Sam, who also holds the patent on the iron chastity belt with fail-safe lock. So good luck with that.
Rick Maese & Dan Diamond of the Washington Post: “A top fundraiser for ... Donald Trump is seeking donations for a new nonprofit that says it will support Trump’s plans to dramatically remake parts of Washington’s waterfront, including East Potomac Golf Course and the proposed National Garden of American Heroes.... The document provides the clearest indication yet that the administration intends to place the garden within West Potomac Park, a prominent stretch of federally owned land along the National Mall that is now used for recreation, sports and large public events. And it signals the seriousness of Trump’s effort to remake the historic public golf course, which government officials reportedly intend to formally take over Sunday, embarking on renovations that could temporarily close the course.
“Interior Department officials have not publicly detailed plans for either the golf course or the proposed garden. The document, circulated to potential donors in recent weeks, includes renderings of East Potomac 'reimagined' as a championship golf course and a formal memorial space — changes that could significantly alter how the public uses the land.... None of the concepts shown in the document have been publicly approved, and any changes to the site would be subject to multiple layers of a federal review process that has not yet begun.” MB: President Megalomaniac apparently thinks the presidency* includes a deed to Washington, D.C., perhaps to all federal lands (hence his damned picture on National Parks passes). This has to stop. ~~~
~~~ Sophie Hurwitz of Mother Jones: "The concept images for the golf course seem to eliminate most non-golf activities that presently exist in East Potomac, disappearing the park’s bike paths and open spaces where people picnic in the summers.... Yesterday, [Trump] posted a picture online of his own face photoshopped onto Mount Rushmore." MB: As I said this morning, ordinary people be damned. And I've got news for you, Sophie. That Mount Rushmore tweet? It's not just a Photoshopped pic; like the golf course/statues renderings, it's a concept image.
Louisiana Primary Elections. Liz Crampton of Politico: “Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry’s abrupt decision to postpone the state’s House primaries just days before voting was scheduled to begin has sent Republican officials scrambling.... Republicans [have] the narrowest of windows to gerrymander one or two new seats before the 2026 midterms — and is leaving candidates guessing where they might be running. Meanwhile, a lawsuit filed late Thursday challenging Landry’s ability to issue the sweeping emergency executive order threatens to further upend Louisiana’s election season. And the move only suspended the House races — meaning the rest of the primaries will continue on as scheduled.... One Louisiana Republican strategist working on a House race ... put it: 'It is” ~~~
~~~ Marie: I hate to tell you, but Louisiana's plight is is a harbinger of the general election to come. We know that in many states, rural areas that tend to lean Republican send in their vote tallies before Democratic-leaning urban areas do. So I fully expect Trump to do just what he advocated in 2020: stop counting votes in some states while Republicans are ahead, even though their Democratic opponents may have won more -- still uncounted -- votes. This was Trump's complaint in 2020; it will be his order in 2026. So yes, our November elections with be "an unmitigated shit show fever dream."
~~~~~~~~~~
Marie: Sorry, I didn't realize how late it was. I've been posting up till 11:30 am ET. I won't do that again.
Erica Green & Megan Mineiro of the New York Times: Donald “Trump sent letters to Congress on Friday making the case that a Vietnam-era law requiring him to seek congressional authorization to continue military operations in Iran did not apply because the conflict was in a cease-fire. In the letters — sent to House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana and Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the president pro tempore of the Senate — Mr. Trump said that he was writing to inform them 'of changes in the posture of United States Forces' and reiterated his administration’s position that a cease-fire he declared on April 7 had stopped the clock on the war.... But Mr. Trump’s letters made the case that there had 'been no exchange of fire between United States Forces and Iran since April 7,' and that hostilities the United States and Israel began on Feb. 28 'have terminated,' in an apparent attempt to avoid having to seek congressional approval. He did not mention that U.S. forces fired on an Iranian-flagged cargo ship on April 19. And just hours later on Friday, the president undercut his own argument. 'You know we’re in a war,' Mr. Trump said in remarks in Florida. 'Because I think you would agree we cannot let lunatics have a nuclear weapon.'
“Senior Democrats immediately rejected the assertion that the cease-fire had paused the clock, an argument the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, first put forward on Thursday.... On Friday, speaking to reporters outside the White House, Mr. Trump asserted that he didn’t need to ask Congress to extend the war 'because it’s never been sought before,' and he claimed that the requirement was 'unconstitutional.'... Congress has, in fact, authorized deployments into major hostilities past 60 days since the enactment of the War Powers Resolution, including major operations like the Persian Gulf War and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as smaller operations like a 1983 peacekeeping mission in Lebanon.” A Politico story is here. ~~~
~~~ Then There's This. AFP, published in the Guardian: “Donald Trump has said the US navy acted 'like pirates' as he described an operation seizing a ship amid the tit-for-tat American blockade of Iranian ports. 'We … land on top of it and we took over the ship. We took over the cargo, took over the oil. It’s a very profitable business,' said Trump at a rally in Florida on Friday. 'We’re like pirates, he added to cheers from the crowd. We’re sort of like pirates. But we’re not playing games.' Trump’s comparison of US naval activity to piracy comes as legal experts raise alarms about Iran’s blockade of the vital strait of Hormuz and its plans to charge a fee for ships passing through it.... The US announced a blockade of Iranian ports last month after peace talks in Pakistan failed to achieve a breakthrough. The US Central Command, responsible for US forces in the Middle East, said it had redirected 45 vessels to ensure compliance' with its blockade as of Friday.” ~~~
~~~ Heather Cox Richardson: “Trump’s letter also ignores the fact the U.S. continues to blockade Iranian ports. A blockade is an act of war. It’s worth reiterating that Trump’s war of aggression violated the Constitution from the start....Now the administration has just told Congress it intends to retain the power to do whatever Trump wants with the United States military.... Trump told reporters, 'Every other president considered it totally unconstitutional, and we agree with that.' In fact, the Framers of the Constitution placed the power to declare war in the hands of Congress and not in the president because they did not trust that much power in the hands of one man.... Senate majority leader John Thune (R-SD) said yesterday he would not challenge Trump’s novel interpretation of the War Powers Act... [Congressional] Republicans have no interest in voting to support Trump’s unpopular war, and yet don’t want to buck Trump. So they are choosing to abdicate their constitutional responsibilities.” ~~~
~~~ Megan Mineiro of the New York Times: “Key Republicans in Congress are growing impatient about the complex and costly conflict in the Middle East as the war reaches its 60-day mark, pivoting after weeks of deferring to ... [Donald] Trump to a more skeptical posture.... [They are] faced with a tough political landscape made more challenging by the unpopular war and the resulting rise in gas prices and consumer goods.... [The] statutory deadline ... also comes as concern about the cost of the conflict is rising and lawmakers are bracing to be asked to approve a request in the tens of billions of dollars or higher to pay for it.” MB: Count me as unimpressed. Mineiro points to a certain degree of handwringing among a few GOP senators to mollify their constituents. But it seems the most aggressive threat any Republican has made is to demand a Senate debate and/or pass a resolution approving the war but putting some squishy limits on it that Trump & Drunk Pete could easily ignore.
Julian Barnes & Helene Cooper of the New York Times: “Pentagon officials said on Friday that they were pulling 5,000 troops from Germany and would redeploy them to the United States and other posts overseas. The Defense Department is also canceling a plan developed under the Biden administration to place a missile-equipped artillery unit in Europe. The moves will return U.S. forces in Europe to the level they were in 2022, before Russia began its war in Ukraine, the officials said.... Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, said in a statement that the withdrawal would be completed over the next six to 12 months.... The Defense Department — particularly during both of ... [Donald] Trump’s terms — has for several years considered decreasing the military presence in Germany. But senior defense officials privately made it clear that they wanted the move to be seen as a punishment for Germany, whose recent comments about the U.S. war in Iran have annoyed Mr. Trump. Earlier this week, Germany’s chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said Iran had 'humiliated' the United States, and he questioned how Mr. Trump planned to end the conflict.” An NBC News story is here. ~~~
~~~ Everything Trump Does Is Stupid. Before the Pentagon's announcement, Victor Jack & Chris Lunday of Politico pointed to costs & difficulties of pulling troops from Germany. For instance, “... a 2025 law ... prevents the president from leaving fewer than 76,000 troops in Europe. With up to 85,000 soldiers on the continent, that gives him a legal maximum of 9,000 soldiers. But even doing that would take 'four years at the minimum' and could cost 'hundreds of billions' of dollars when accounting for indirect expenses as well, said retired Gen. Mark Hertling, the former commanding officer of U.S. Army Europe who helped manage a significant American drawdown between 2003 and 2011. That doesn’t account for broader complexities and costs, he argued, including shifting thousands of soldiers’ families, firing local German workers, closing down hospitals and leaving newly upgraded bases abandoned.” Thanks to Akhilleus for the link. ~~~
~~~ Marie: As usual, the people who will be hurt most by Trump's pique are ordinary people: soldiers & their families who will be uprooted, small German vendors who supply the U.S. bases, and U.S. taxpayers who have to pay for the disruptive moves.
Dan Diamond of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump said Friday that he was eager to deliver his first public speech since he was hustled from a hotel stage Saturday, after an attempted shooter breached the perimeter of the White House correspondents’ dinner. And the president picked a familiar stop for his return address: The Villages, a retirement community in Florida and a longtime Republican stronghold.... [The] 94-minute event ... featured several guests — and was peppered with Trump’s profane jokes and complaints.... He mocked Democrats in crass terms, including one unnamed lawmaker that he said was a 'sleazebag,' for focusing on affordability ahead of the midterm elections. 'They’ve got one good line of bullshit,' the president said, blaming Democrats for policies that he said had led to inflation. Trump also polled the crowd on which nickname he should use to mock former president Joe Biden.... He performed his impression of a transgender weightlifter that he said first lady Melania Trump had begged him not to do.”
Marie: I'm not much of a fan of Steve Rattner, but Joe Jervis/Joe.My.God points to a useful MS NOW segment Rattner did on MS NOW that outlines how Trump suckered his fans. Rattner explains the crux of the scam: “... [Trump] created something called a $Trump coin. And ... there was a $Melania coin a little bit later. It is a coin that means nothing. It is like buying a pet rock, except you don’t even get a rock; it has no value. It has no trading value, it’s not used in commerce — nothing. They sold them initially at $7 and went all the way up to $45. Not surprisingly, it crashed.... So there have been found to be 45 what are called whale wallets, huge buyers of this stuff early on in the process. Then as crypto went up, these whales, and it could include Trump ... they made $1.2 billion. Trump, we know, made about $600 million in trading fees and so forth on this.... Who lost were two million innocent Americans who bought this thing because they thought Trump was great or whatever. They lost $4.3 billion by buying [when the coins were trading at high prices] and now [they own] something that is worth less than $3.” ~~~
~~~ RAS, who linked Jervis's post, suggests that Trump may have tipped off or colluded with whales -- for a price. You can watch the MS NOW segment on Jervis's post or here on YouTube.
Marie: Oh, here's a Trumpian "beautification" project that slipped my mind: ~~~
Luke Broadwater & Zachary Small of the New York Times: Donald “Trump’s vision for his National Garden of American Heroes is growing larger and most likely more expensive than his initial estimates, with the latest plans calling for reflecting pools, dining facilities and an amphitheater alongside 250 life-size statues of notable Americans. The plans have expanded to the point that they could require significant redevelopment of West Potomac Park, an area of mostly sports fields near the National Mall.... The statues alone could cost more than the $40 million approved for the project by Congress, according to the Trump administration’s estimate. Based on the latest renderings, the Garden of Heroes could rank among the more expensive and time-consuming projects Mr. Trump has undertaken as he works to remake the nation’s capital in his own style. Construction has yet to begin, raising questions about whether Mr. Trump will run out of time — and money — to deliver on his ambitions before the end of his second term.” The link has been updated to one that appears to be a gift link. ~~~
~~~ Marie: I suppose tourists from Kansas might enjoy dining at the Trumpomat and looking at their faces in the Narcissists' Pools, so to hell with the locals who might enjoy playing a game in a free national park baseball field. As you will have guessed, Trump's "heroes" don't include Barack Obama. But Canadian/teevee personality Alex Trebek & British filmmaker Alfred Hitchcock (both of whom became dual U.S. citizens, maintaining their citizenship in their birth countries) do count as American heroes. (I have nothing against either Trebek & Hitchcock, but do they bring to mind "American heroism"? I don't think so.)
Shane Goldmacher of the New York Times: Donald “Trump has spent the past year using the federal government to target those he considers his political enemies. Now, in a series of primaries this month, he is turning his ire on fellow Republicans by asking voters to punish those who have crossed him. Contests in Indiana, Louisiana and Kentucky in the coming weeks all feature Trump-backed challengers trying to oust Republican incumbents who have earned Mr. Trump’s ire. The fights have soaked up energy and cash from the president’s allies and his political operation, pulling attention away from the broader battle with Democrats over control of Congress this fall.”
Marie: re: the 8647 crime of the century, RAS was trying to figure out just what's illegal. As RAS discovered, the Lincoln Project also was unsure. I scrolled on down the page of responses to the Lincoln Center's Bluesky post and found a number of other -- quite humorous -- possibilities. This was my favorite (and yes, I had Art Intel do the math; I can't remember how to find the square root of a number, even when I'm pretty sure I know the answer) (Also linked yesterday):&
Marie: I thought I knew the meaning of "86," (and I did), but I thought I should look for an expert opinion. So I turned to Merriam-Webster: "Eighty-six is slang meaning 'to throw out,' 'to get rid of,' or 'to refuse service to.' It comes from 1930s soda-counter slang meaning that an item was sold out. There is varying anecdotal evidence about why the term eighty-six was used, but the most common theory is that it is rhyming slang for nix." After giving numerous examples and offering some theories on the earliest usages of the term, M-W writes, "Among the most recent senses adopted is a logical extension of the previous ones, with the meaning of 'to kill.' We do not enter this sense, due to its relative recency and sparseness of use." ~~~
According to Art Intel, ""While popularly known as restaurant jargon for running out of an item, it is considered, a at times, deadly mafia-related term for murder, particularly in urban legends where it implies taking someone '8 miles out and 6 feet under,' as noted in and on Quora. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Since our president* is a mafia-style boss, I guess it's not surprising that he would adopt the mafia-related meaning. As Evan Hurst of Wonkette wrote yesterday, "It makes sense, of course, that the mob boss president would be clinging to references like that. Because he’s old. And sad. And his brain is expired." Hurst notes that in the Oval Office Wednesday, in response to a reporter's question, Trump said,
"Well if anybody knows anything about crime, they know 86, you know, 86, it’s a mob term for kill ‘em, you ever seen the movies? 86 ‘em! The mobster says to one of his wonderful associates, '86 ‘em, that means kill ‘em! It’s uh, I think of it as a mob term, I don’t, people think of it as something having to do with disappearing, but the mob uses that term to say, when they want to kill somebody, they say “86 the son of a gun!” I’m trying to keep the language nice and clear, they don’t use that term “son of a gun” they use another term, but that’s a mob term for kill ‘em."
Isabella Kwai, et al., of the New York Times: “The F.B.I. and prosecutors shared on Thursday new footage of the man charged with trying to assassinate ... [Donald] Trump during the White House correspondents’ dinner at the Washington Hilton last weekend, leading up to when shots were fired. The video contains more than five minutes of edited and annotated surveillance footage.... It was shared on social media by the F.B.I. and Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. In her post on Thursday, Ms. Pirro asserted that the video resolved uncertainty about whose gunfire had struck a Secret Service officer, who was protected by his bulletproof vest. The video, she wrote, showed that the man charged in the case, Cole Tomas Allen, had shot the Secret Service officer, and that there was 'no evidence the shooting was the result of friendly fire.'... Law enforcement and administration officials had previously stopped short of definitively saying whose gunfire had struck the officer’s vest, and the charges lodged against Mr. Allen on Monday ... did not include shooting a federal officer, only with firing a weapon.” ~~~
Debra Kamin & Santul Nerkar of the New York Times: “When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was seeking the nomination to become health secretary, he consulted with a crisis communications firm that has been accused of running a smear campaign against the actress Blake Lively, according to records unsealed on Friday in Manhattan federal court. The records show that a strategist associated with the firm, The Agency Group, promised in late 2024 to help suppress negative stories about Mr. Kennedy, boost positive ones and create an algorithm 'to manage concerns' related to negative publicity. It was not clear whether the firm, which is also known as TAG PR, performed any work on Mr. Kennedy’s behalf. The documents were gathered by Ms. Lively’s legal team [for a suit having nothing to do with Mr. Kennedy].... The records include a deposition that quotes an email from the strategist, Jed Wallace, to a TAG executive in which Mr. Wallace explicitly describes pushing positive stories and burying negative ones about Mr. Kennedy. The same email also noted that Mr. Wallace believed positive coverage might draw the attention of ... [Donald] Trump.... At the time, Mr. Kennedy had abandoned a bid to become president and was facing questions about his past behavior.” Update: the link has been changed to one that appears to be a gift link. ~~~
~~~ Marie: So for our next question: will Trump dump Kennedy because Kennedy conned him? It's not the right reason to fire Kennedy, of course, but I'm not sure I care. I'm just hoping for Kennedy's ouster.
Sheryl Stolberg of the New York Times: “A National Institutes of Health employee who was put on paid leave after organizing a public letter that criticized the Trump administration said on Friday that she had been reinstated — a move that followed the reinstatement of 14 Federal Emergency Management Agency employees who had signed a critical letter of their own. The employee, Jenna Norton, was a key organizer of 'The Bethesda Declaration,' issued in June 2025 and signed by nearly 500 N.I.H. employees, which deplored the degradation of medical research under Mr. Trump. The document spawned a wave of other public letters, including one known as the Katrina Declaration, signed by the FEMA employees, which warned that the agency risked repeating mistakes it had made during the Hurricane Katrina disaster more than two decades ago. Dr. Norton, a program director at the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, was sent home with pay in November, when she tried to return to work after a 43-day government shutdown. She subsequently filed a whistle-blower complaint.... She has emerged as a high-profile critic of the administration, speaking out on social media and in interviews. This week, she received a four-sentence email telling her to return to work on Monday, she said, but it gave no reason for the reinstatement.”
Ana Ley & Ashley Ahn of the New York Times: “A federal judge in New York on Friday blocked the Trump administration from revoking temporary legal protections next week for Yemeni migrants. The decision offered the migrants a fragile victory as the government seeks to end pathways for people fleeing humanitarian crises. In a strongly worded opinion, Judge Dale E. Ho of Federal District Court in Manhattan said that the government had ignored the law when it tried to deport people who had been rigorously vetted in order to receive Temporary Protected Status.... 'T.P.S. holders from Yemen are not “killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies,’” Judge Ho wrote in the decision. 'They are ordinary, law-abiding people who have been granted status to be here because the government has repeatedly determined, in accordance with the T.P.S. statute, that Yemen is subject to an ongoing armed conflict, and that, due to that conflict, requiring them to return would pose a serious threat to their safety.' In March, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and the Center for Constitutional Rights sued the U.S. government on behalf of seven Yemeni nationals after Kristi Noem, then the homeland security secretary, announced Yemen’s removal from the T.P.S. program.” ~~~
~~~ Marie: Although the reporters don't bother to explain it, Judge Ho's reference to “killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies” cites an X tweet Noem wrote in December 2025: “I just met with the President. I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that’s been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies.” Noem, of course, said a lot of really bigoted, stupid stuff. And she did a lot of really bigoted, stupid stuff -- like when she put Greg Bovino in charge of immigration enforcement in several cities: ~~~
~~~ Josh Kovensky, et al., of TPM: “After the operation he oversaw in Minneapolis — one of several he conducted with a position out of the chain of command — saw two protestors killed by federal agents, [Greg Bovino] left the government. That hasn’t kept him away from becoming a fascist influencer. In a lengthy interview this week with a program called 'Died Suddenly' — a spinoff program from the creators of the 2022 anti-vax film by the same name, produced by far-right figure Stew Peters, who runs an extremist media empire — hosts Lauren Witzke and Edward Szall asked Bovino about the 'Renee Good types' and 'what were the American protestors like?' 'Cannon fodder,' Bovino replied.” Read on.
Pam Belluck of the New York Times: “A federal appeals court issued a ruling on Friday temporarily halting the ability of abortion providers to prescribe pills using telemedicine and send them to patients by mail, blocking what has become a major avenue for women seeking abortions in recent years. The order comes in a case in which the state of Louisiana is suing the Food and Drug Administration, seeking to sharply curtail access to the abortion pill mifepristone. In the order, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted Louisiana’s request for a temporary stay of the F.D.A.’s decision several years ago to remove a requirement that patients see a medical provider in person before the pills could be prescribed. The court order, citing Louisiana’s claims that making pills available by mail has allowed patients there to access the medication despite the state’s near-total abortion ban, said that 'Louisiana has shown that it is irreparably harmed without a stay.' In April, a Federal District Court in Louisiana had declined to pause the availability of pills by mail....” The AP's report is here. ~~~
~~~ "Government by Lawsuit.”Alice Ollstein of Politico: “A panel of three judges ruled unanimously in favor of arguments from Louisiana that the Biden-era regulations on the drug threaten the state’s sovereignty and the safety of pregnant women. Two of the judges were appointed by Donald Trump and the other by George W. Bush.... The decision ... is arguably the biggest rollback in access to abortion since the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling overturning Roe v. Wade. In their ruling, the judges rejected the Trump administration’s assertion that the state lacks standing, and that the court should hit pause on the case while the FDA conducts its own review of the drug.... The judge [whom the Appeals Court overruled], Trump appointee David C. Joseph, warned that granting Louisiana’s request to reimpose the rule that patients only obtain mifepristone in person from a doctor would be, in effect, 'government by lawsuit.'... Medical and progressive advocacy groups predicted the case will be swiftly appealed to the Supreme Court, which could pause the ruling and restore telemedicine access to the drugs while the case plays out in lower courts.” ~~~
~~~ Marie: Louisiana has always been a bug, festering swampland both literally and figuratively, but it's becoming worse now. (See also Callais v. Louisiana, Alito opinion.) ~~~
~~~ Maegan Vazquez of the Washington Post: “Two more Republican-controlled states took steps Friday to redraw their congressional maps as party leaders try to capitalize on the Supreme Court’s decision this week to weaken the Voting Rights Act. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R) and Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee (R) both called special sessions aimed at picking up more Republican seats, part of a gerrymandering war unprecedented in modern times. That followed Republican Gov. Jeff Landry’s announcement Thursday that he would suspend Louisiana’s May 16 U.S. House primaries so his state could redraw its map.” (Related story linked under “Louisiana Senate Race” below.) A related AP story is here. ~~~
~~~ Nick Corasaniti & Emily Cochrane of the New York Times: “Voters and key voting rights groups filed multiple lawsuits against Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana on Friday over his order to suspend the state’s House primary, arguing that he had overstepped his executive powers by delaying the election to give lawmakers time to draw a new congressional map. The state court rejected the pleas by the groups for an emergency order to immediately block the governor from suspending the primary, and scheduled a preliminary hearing for next week. With early in-person voting set to begin on Saturday, the legal action could further upend Louisiana’s rapidly shifting election calendar amid a dizzying series of developments since the Supreme Court rejected Louisiana’s map as an illegal racial gerrymander.... 'I think it’s fairly described as dramatic, where the governor is trying to change the election on Thursday, when early voting starts on Saturday,' said Sarah Brannon ... of the A.C.L.U.’s Voting Rights Project, which is representing the plaintiffs in the case.” ~~~
~~~ Erin Cox & Clara Morse of the Washington Post: “The Supreme Court’s ruling to limit a key part of the landmark Voting Rights Act this week adds a new bend to the winding history of Black representation in Congress, fueling fear from civil rights leaders that history will repeat itself and reverse years of gains. The rise of Black lawmakers right after the Civil War prompted White backlash, giving way to long droughts in congressional representation. It took the nation decades after the civil rights era to have as many Black lawmakers in the South as there were after Reconstruction.” ~~~
Nikolas Bowie & “authors of the forthcoming book 'Supremacy: How Rule by the Court Replaced Government by the People,'” in a New York Times op-ed: “With its decision this week in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court gutted a core part of the Voting Rights Act, Congress’s landmark prohibition on voting rules that have the effect of excluding people of color from the political process. In doing so, the court has, not for the first time, claimed an authority to reject laws passed by Congress in service of equal justice and a free society. And it has effectively killed the Second Reconstruction, the mid-20th-century civil rights revolution. In the face of this decision, Congress must once again defend democracy from a hostile court. A plan of action already exists.... In 1862, Congress and President Abraham Lincoln enacted legislation that banned slavery in places the Dred Scott decision had protected it. Congress also drafted the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution, all of which advanced Congress’s goals of freedom and political equality while empowering Congress to enforce its terms by 'appropriate legislation.'” ~~~
~~~ Marie: We do know how that worked out, don't we? Anyway, read on. The link appears to be a gift link. However, I wholeheartedly agree that "something must be done" about the Court's overreach, so when and if I come upon proposals that sound don't promise to lead to a second U.S. civil war, I'll link them.
Marco's Longtime Friend Goes to Jail. Jeremy Roebuck & Teo Armus of the Washington Post: “A former Florida congressman and political mentor to Secretary of State Marco Rubio was convicted Friday for his role in a secret $50 million campaign to lobby officials in Washington on behalf of the Venezuelan government. A federal jury found David Rivera, a Republican from Miami who served one term in the House from 2011 to 2013, guilty on counts including failing to register as a foreign agent and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The jury also convicted an associate of Rivera’s, political consultant Esther Nuhfer, on related charges. The former congressman was immediately taken into custody following the verdict. U.S. District Judge Melissa Damian concluded he was a flight risk with access to sizable funds and a potentially lengthy prison term in his future.” The link is a gift link. You may want to read on because the story describes some of Marco's links to Rivera.
Vimal Patel of the New York Times: “The president of Bard College, who has run the unorthodox liberal-arts school for more than a half century, announced his retirement on Friday, after the release of documents that showed he had a closer relationship with Jeffrey Epstein than previously known. The president, Leon Botstein, was known for his fund-raising prowess and outsize personality.... The [Epstein] files showed Dr. Botstein had exchanged messages and visits with Mr. Epstein for years, including after Mr. Epstein’s conviction on solicitation of a minor for prostitution. In one 2013 note, Dr. Botstein signed off with 'Miss you.' He spoke of his cherished 'new friendship' with the financier, and wished him well after the publication of news article that detailed his abuse. The college commissioned an independent review..., and the findings were released on Friday. The review found that Dr. Botstein had done nothing illegal but that his relationship with Mr. Epstein raised concerns about his leadership. The review said that Dr. Botstein had ignored the concerns of a senior faculty member who advised him that Bard should avoid Mr. Epstein.”
Niraj Chokshi of the New York Times: “Spirit Airlines turned off the lights for good Saturday morning. The airline canceled all flights effective immediately and told passengers not to go to the airport, according to a notice posted on its website shortly after 2 a.m. Eastern. On the homepage, where customers could previously make reservations, a bright yellow banner declared that Spirit was 'winding down all operations.' The budget airline had lost billions of dollars in recent years, filing for bankruptcy in 2024 and 2025. Spirit hoped to emerge from its second bankruptcy this summer as a smaller company, but those plans fell apart as fuel prices rose in recent weeks. As Spirit’s fate became clear, the Trump administration offered a $500 million federal lifeline, but the airline’s investors and government officials could not reach an agreement on how to structure a deal to save the company. [Earlier this week,] the airline’s creditors ... urged the company’s board to begin shutting down....” Politico's story is here. ~~~
~~~ Marie: If you had a Spirit ticket, you'd be justified in blaming Trump -- at least in part -- for losing your ride: “'Unfortunately..., the recent material increase in oil prices and other pressures on the business have significantly impacted Spirit’s financial outlook,' the airline said.” Emphasis added.
Marie: In his speech before a joint session of Congress this week, King Charles said, “This is a city which symbolizes a period in our shared history, or what Charles Dickens might have called ‘A Tale of Two Georges’: the first President, George Washington, and my five-times Great Grandfather, King George III.” But there is another tale to be told here, “The Tale of George III and Donald.” ~~~
~~~ Stacy Schiff, in a New York Times op-ed, gives it a go: “Most of us can rattle off at least part of Jefferson’s incandescent opening [to the Declaration of Independence]. But the next 650 or so words were the reason he composed the thing in the first place. They made the American case, in the most concrete terms, that King George III was guilty of every kind of abuse of power.... In 2026 they also feel miserably familiar. [Schiff lists grievance after grievance that the colonists enumerated against George III & includes here own commentary on most of them. The commentary usually invokes Trump's and/or his administration's atrocities.] At the end of his inventory of abuses and usurpations, Jefferson slips in a zinger: 'A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.'” The link is a gift link.
Maureen Dowd of the New York Times: “On his last state visit [in 1985], Charles was in the shade of Diana’s radiance. On this one, he radiated an élan of his own — a class act, shining next to the boorish Trump. At long last, Charles was in no one’s shadow. At 77, he has done what he always yearned to do: make his mark on the world.... In a country rife with No Kings protests, this king was a tonic. He presented himself with elegance, intelligence and wit — everything that has been wanting in Washington during the Trump era.... In his pointed speech to Congress, he reminded the lawmakers that our Constitution, based on Magna Carta, provides checks on a tyrant’s power. The king deftly schooled Donald, and Donald took it because he has always been awed by the British royal family.” ~~~
~~~ Marie: Dowd is right. Here's the photo I recall from "Charles"' state visit in 1985 (Dowd is misremembering, however, when she claims Diana "wore a gorgeous midnight blue velvet gown and a diamond tiara." No tiara, but she wore her classic blue sapphire & pearl choker.):
~~~~~~~~~~
Kentucky Senate Race. Theodoric Meyer & Hannah Knowles of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump on Friday endorsed Rep. Andy Barr (R-Kentucky) to succeed Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell, who is not running for reelection after more than four decades in the Senate. Trump’s endorsement upends a competitive Senate contest weeks ahead of the May 19 primary. Barr was expected to face Daniel Cameron, a former Kentucky attorney general, and Nate Morris, a waste management company founder. Morris said Friday that he would leave the race at Trump’s request to serve as an ambassador.... After Morris endorsed Barr, Cameron’s campaign said he would remain in the race.”
Louisiana Senate Race. Max Rego of the Hill: “Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said Thursday that Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) deciding to move forward with the state’s Senate primary election ... was 'disappointing.' Landry signed an executive order earlier Thursday suspending the House primary elections in Louisiana, a day after the Supreme Court ruled that the state’s congressional map was unconstitutional. All other primaries, including a challenge to Cassidy from Rep. Julia Letlow (R) and state Treasurer John Fleming, will go on as planned — with early voting starting Saturday and the final day to cast a ballot set for May 16. 'The governor’s decision to move ahead with the Senate race during a confusing time is disappointing,' [Cassidy said.].”
~~~~~~~~~~
Iran. Farnaz Fassihi of the New York Times: “Narges Mohammadi, an Iranian Nobel Peace Prize laureate and prominent human rights activist, was transferred to a hospital in the city of Zanjan, where she was in prison, after collapsing and losing consciousness on Friday, according to a statement by her family. Ms. Mohammadi is currently in the hospital’s intensive care unit. But the judicial authorities have refused requests from her family and her lawyer to transfer her to a better-equipped hospital in the country’s capital, Tehran, where she could be cared for by her longtime cardiologist, according to a statement by her foundation, the Narges Foundation, and her husband, Taghi Rahmani.”
Mexico. Jack Nicas of the New York Times: “Rubén Rocha Moya, the Mexican governor indicted by the United States this week, said Friday night that he would temporarily step down from his post, expanding the political fallout from accusations that he aided a powerful drug cartel for years. Mr. Rocha, 76, said in a two-minute recorded statement late Friday that he was innocent but would take 'a temporary leave of absence' as governor of the Mexican state of Sinaloa to focus on defending himself from the accusations.... Mr. Rocha’s case has dominated the national conversation in Mexico since Manhattan prosecutors unsealed an indictment on Wednesday accusing him and nine other current and former Mexican officials of a yearslong conspiracy to protect the Sinaloa Cartel in exchange for bribes and political support. The cartel has long dominated Sinaloa, a state of three million on Mexico’s western coast, and prosecutors portrayed Mr. Rocha as central to the group’s impunity since his election in 2021.”




7 comments:
"A CNN investigation reveals a majority of U.S. military sites in the Middle East are damaged by Iranian strikes."
So once again the administration says one thing while showing us another. Security is lucky that no one actually got hurt with the guard shooting in the direction of so many of his coworkers.
The Bowie and Renan piece is worth the pondering.
In its reach for Supreme supremacy the High Court has further tipped the three branches out of balance. Here we are, worried that the executive is amassing too much power, and with the cooperation and support of the Supremes it is, but the Supremes who are calling the vital shots in a few shouts and many whispers.
And yet, now that Congress appears to be totally sidelined, interestingly the only branch designed to be more (the House) or less (the Senate) directly beholden to the people, we read about how only the courts can save us from the Pretender.
The question the authors ask: Who will save us from the Court?
"ICE hires firm accused of ‘torture’ to track down undocumented children
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has awarded a contract to a private security company that has faced accusations of “torture” and “enforced disappearance” to assist in tracking down undocumented immigrant children who arrived in the US alone, a contracting document shows.
The agency characterizes the work of tracing immigrant children who reached the US without authorization and were released into communities while they go through immigration court proceedings as “safety and wellness checks”. ICE says it wants to confirm the children’s location, school enrollment and overall wellness, including checking for signs of abuse or trafficking, according to the contracting document.
But an internal ICE document reviewed by the Guardian last year shows ICE actually runs the operations with the aim of deporting the children or pursuing criminal cases against them – or their adult sponsors sheltering them legally in the US. A critic at the time called ICE’s efforts “backdoor family separation”."
Sometimes he does get it right, if for the wrong reasons.
"Trump says anyone running for president should take a cognitive exam because you could end being stuck with a moron for years.
“I mean, you get a guy who gets in there, he's got a good line of crap. He gets in and all of a sudden you're stuck with a man who's a moron”"
@RAS: Add to that, what he actually said was that "anybody running for president or vice president should be forced to take a coganadative examination."
That exam should be an annual affair, with the date unannounced to the president just to see how far up the tree they've been driven.
Post a Comment