Theodoric Meyer & Jarrell Dillard of the Washington Post: “The Senate rejected an initial effort Thursday to bar the Trump administration from creating a controversial fund to compensate people who claim they were wrongfully prosecuted or investigated. Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Jon Husted (Ohio) and Dan Sullivan (Alaska) joined Democrats in voting for the amendment, which failed 50-49. Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colorado) did not vote. The vote was the first of several expected attempts to amend legislation that Republicans are seeking to pass Thursday to fund federal immigration enforcement agencies — as a way to guarantee that the Trump administration cannot set up such a payout fund.” MB: All three Republicans who voted with Democrats are running for re-election this year.
So Long, Farewell, Auf Wieders'hen, Good Night. Jonathan Edwards of the Washington Post: “The Kennedy Center on Thursday ordered employees to remove ... Donald Trump’s name from the performing arts venue, telling staff members in a memo from its general counsel that they have until June 12 to strip all references from signs, brochures, the website and other materials — and to update email signatures and letterhead immediately. The directive came six days after U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that the Kennedy Center’s board had exceeded its authority when it voted in December to add Trump’s name to the center. The memo was the first indication that the Kennedy Center plans to comply with Cooper’s order.” MB: Sounds like a fun watch party is in order. Dibs on the “M”!
The Arc de Trump Is a Dangerous, Half-Baked Monstrosity. But Trump Has Put His Pudgy Thumb on the Scale. Luke Broadwater of the New York Times: Donald “Trump's plan to build a 250-foot arch in Washington is up for review on Thursday by a federal planning commission, which will consider whether the structure could disrupt flight patterns or violate laws restricting the height of buildings in the nation’s capital. The National Capital Planning Commission, which is led by allies of Mr. Trump, has received nearly 1,700 public comments about the proposed triumphal arch, almost all of which opposed it. Staff at the commission have also raised several issues about Mr. Trump’s plan. Aside from their concerns about the flight pattern and height issues, members of the panel have said the president’s proposal lacks adequate information about building materials, proposed lighting and storm water management compliance, according to a document prepared by the group before Thursday’s meeting. The commission is the federal government’s planning agency for the Washington, D.C., region, but Republicans and employees of Mr. Trump control a majority of the votes on the panel.”
Marie: Earlier today, I linked to a NYT story with the lede: Donald “Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that strips job protections from nearly 8,000 federal workers who are in policy-making roles, making it easier for the administration to fire them.” We already know that everything Trump does is wrong. In today's Comments, Patrick explains the core of what's wrong with essentially forcing these civil servants to become political hacks.
The plea agreement set up with John Bolton makes clear that Fat Hitler knows for a 100% true fact that sneaking off with secret documents is a CRIME. But only others can be held liable for it. He has total immunity, thanks so much, John Roberts, you incredible asshole. -- Akhilleus, in today's Comments ~~~
Bolton Makes a Deal. Devlin Barrett & Michael Schmidt of the New York Times: “John R. Bolton, a national security adviser to ... [Donald] Trump in his first term, has reached a tentative deal with prosecutors to plead guilty to mishandling classified information when he compiled notes for a book that was harshly critical of the president, according to two people familiar with the matter.... Under the terms of the plea deal, which still requires approval from a judge, Mr. Bolton plans to plead guilty to a single count of illegal retention of classified information and pay a fine, facing anywhere from no prison time to five years of incarceration when he is sentenced.... If Mr. Bolton had gone to trial and lost, he could have faced decades in prison. The plea would provide [Mr.] Trump perhaps his most significant victory in his campaign to prosecute his perceived enemies, which so far has largely foundered once cases hit the courts.” Thanks to RAS for the lead. Update: I've changed the link to one that appears to be a gift link.
~~~~~~~~~~
Marie: This is a test because of course this blogger thing is not working right. I've been trying for an hour to get this (partial) update to load. Okay, it doesn't work in Firefox at all, so -- to make a long story short -- I have to update in Firefox, then transfer the update to Chrome. Then update again. Just weird. I'm going to try a few more tricks, so I may trick myself out of being able to do any updates at all. If so, don't worry; I'm fine, my computer system is not. At worst, I should be back in a couple of days. ~~~
~~~ Test 4. Huh. I think this one worked. Maybe. This is a nightmare. P.S. Sorry. I thought I was thru whining earlier. (See below.) I guess not.
Marie: I don't know how this will to go. I had to turn my computer over to BestBuy for a couple of days, so I'm working off a teeny-tiny laptop that doesn't have my password information; ergo, I'm not sure what sites I can log into. I did just find my way to the NYT, so there's that. In the meantime, I may become weak from hunger, as I can't go shopping: somebody in California stole my debit and credit card info, and the Bank of America, which loves to stiff its customers, says it will be six to ten business days before they cut me new cards & get them in my mailbox. This is where I notice that the institutions upon which we all rely can kick us out of our normal existence just like that. So much for my whining; let's see what I can do under straitened circumstances.
~~~~~~~~~~
What a Good Boy Is He. Jeremy Roebuck & Perry Stein of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump said Wednesday he planned to formally nominate acting attorney general Todd Blanche for a full term as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer, signaling confidence in his former personal defense lawyer’s leadership of a department over which the president has sought to exert unprecedented control. Trump announced his intention to move forward Thursday with the nomination during a White House dinner Wednesday evening, according to a video of his remarks posted to social media by deputy White House chief of staff Dan Scavino.” An MS NOW report is here.
In case you were kidding yourself into thinking
that Trump's lawyer had killed the slush fund to pay off the
cop-beating, insurrectionist goon squad, let's check on what his
client is saying: ~~~
~~~ Luke Broadwater of the New York Times: Donald “Trump on Wednesday said he still loved the idea of a $1.8 billion fund to use taxpayer money to pay his allies who claim they have been politically persecuted, even after his administration said it was dropping the plan. Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, said on Tuesday that the administration was 'not moving forward with the fund, period,' after the plan drew enormous, bipartisan backlash.... 'I love it,' Mr. Trump said of the fund. 'I think it’s so important.'... Asked whether the fund was actually dead or merely on hold, the president said: 'I’d have to ask the lawyers.' He added: 'The weaponization fund, as far as I’m concerned, was a beautiful thing.' The president then spoke in praiseworthy terms of the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, chanting 'Hang Mike Pence,' defacing the halls of Congress and attacking and injuring more than 150 officers. 'These are great people that were destroyed, their families have been destroyed,' he said, adding, 'They went there with love.'” ~~~
We’ll see how that all works out.... But a radical-left judge ruled against it, but these people, their lives have been destroyed, their families have been destroyed, many of them. Not just, I’m not just talking about a few people, many of them. I’m one of them. -- Donald Trump, hedging on slush fund, to reporters in the Oval Office, Wednesday ~~~
~~~ Cat Zakrzewski of the Washington Post has more: “Trump cut off [a] reporter when she pressed him on Republican lawmakers’ concerns that 'people who beat up cops' would be eligible for payments from the fund. Trump’s unexpected Oval Office session with reporters was his first public appearance — and his first exchange with the White House press corps — in about a week, an unusually long time for him.” The headlineon the WashPo front page is “President declines to say $1.8 billion fund is dead.” ~~~
~~~ Oh, And There's This. Theodore Schleifer & Ken Bensinger of the New York Times: “A little-noticed nonprofit founded by Trump donors has been raising millions of dollars to provide legal assistance to the president’s allies, including those who may want to sue the government over claims of unjust prosecution. The pot of money, called the Lawfare Defense Fund, has raised at least $36 million to support those who consider themselves unjust victims of the legal system with grants to pay for litigation. The fund, which is registered as a charity, has operated in relative obscurity, with no public-facing presence or communications.... The Lawfare Defense Fund could boost Mr. Trump’s efforts to aid supporters, especially as his administration’s plan founders.” MB: The reporters claim Trump “has retreated” from his slush fund scheme. I don't think so. Akhilleus pointed out in commentary yesterday that the media constantly sane-washes Trump's remarks and behavior. Claiming Trump has retreated from a corrupt -- and unpopular -- initiative is beyond sane-washing; it's simply lying to make Trump seem like a reasonable person. (The article is dated June 3. There's no time-stamp on it, so it could have been published before Trump spoke up in favor of the slush fund yesterday. If so, the story should have been updated to reflect his remarks, which indicate he has not “retreated” from his advocacy for the slush fund and Jan 6 thugs.)
Hafiz Rashid of the New Republic, republished by Yahoo! News: Donald "Trump was sporting a swollen eye and hand in an interview with New York Post's Miranda Devine on the conservative podcast Pod Force One. Trump's right eye clearly showed puffiness and looked oddly misshapen compared to his left eye, while his right hand looked much bigger than his left.... No matter how much Trump talks about how great his medical tests are going or how well he's doing, it's plainly evident that the public isn't being told the whole story." MB: So Trump disappears from public view for a week during which he had an extensive physical, and he come back with a swollen black eye & a swollen, bruised hand, and we're supposed to think he's just fine???
Eileen Sullivan of the New York Times: Donald “Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that strips job protections from nearly 8,000 federal workers who are in policy-making roles, making it easier for the administration to fire them. The Trump administration previously estimated that as many as 50,000 federal workers could lose job protections under this new policy. Administration officials said Wednesday that there were no plans to include more than the nearly 8,000 positions outlined in an appendix to the executive order, but the president could decide to add more in the future. The jobs covered by the executive order include the heads of agency components, those who run an office or a program, people who develop and write regulations, lawyers involved in setting agency policies and employees who determine which organizations receive grants.”
Trump's Latest Tariff Scam. David Lynch of the Washington Post: “The Trump administration has taken a key step toward rebuilding a tariff wall around the U.S. economy, announcing new restrictions on goods from 60 trading partners that U.S. officials say lack sufficient prohibitions on the use of forced labor. Under the plan, goods from nations that the U.S. says have not banned forced labor, including China, India, Britain and Japan, will face 12.5 percent tariffs. Goods from the European Union, Canada, Mexico and other nations that the U.S. says have failed to enforce bans will face 10 percent levies, the administration said in a late-night announcement Tuesday.... The planned tariffs, which will be implemented next month following a public comment period, are the result of a Section 301 investigation by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), which permits the president to act against unfair trade practices.... Some U.S. trading partners reacted sharply to the announcement. A spokesman for the European Commission, the E.U.’s executive arm, called the new tariffs 'unjustified,' while the head of the European Parliament’s trade committee accused the administration of inventing a rationale for new trade levies.”
David Fahrenthold of the New York Times: “The Trump administration ... is using a no-bid contract to spruce up some of the capital’s more obscure features: four largely overlooked statues near the National Mall. The statues, featuring 19-foot-tall humans and horses, have been deteriorating for decades.... But this spring, the government decided that the figures needed to be covered in 23.75-karat gold leaf, and that this painstaking job needed to be done before the country’s 250th birthday.... The Trump administration said again that it needed to bypass the legally required process of seeking competitive bids. It handed a contract now worth $5.1 million directly to a handpicked vendor called the Gilders’ Studio, based in Maryland....
“When Mr. Trump launched a broad makeover of Washington landmarks last year, repairing monuments and statues across the capital, these statues were left out. In late March, however, the Park Service began to treat them as a high priority.... The Park Service estimated in late March that the repair work would cost about $2.4 million. Katie Martin, a spokeswoman for the Interior Department, which oversees the Park Service, declined to say why the cost of the contract was roughly double that.”
They're All Criminals. Some Are Violent Criminals. Like This Guy. Joyce Lee., et al., of the Washington Post: “A recent appointee to a sensitive counterterrorism job in the Defense Department was filmed for more than five minutes during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot as he moved through restricted grounds and climbed through a broken window, holding a metal pole, to enter the U.S. Capitol, according to a Washington Post analysis. The Post reported Tuesday that Elias Irizarry, who was 19 at the time of the attack, was hired to a post in the Pentagon’s Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict office. The team’s portfolio includes operations such as embassy security, personnel recovery and hostage rescue. Irizarry pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor trespass charge in 2022 and was later pardoned by President Donald Trump along with many others who were at the Capitol on Jan. 6.... In a statement, acting Pentagon press secretary Joel Valdez said that Irizarry 'is a qualified, patriotic young professional, and we are proud to have him as a political appointee.'”
Fatima Hussein of the AP: “Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent refused to say Wednesday whether ... Donald Trump and his family would still get immunity from IRS audits after the administration abandoned plans for a $1.776 billion compensation fund that would have benefited the president’s allies. 'There’s continuing litigation, and I’m unable to comment on ongoing litigation,' Bessent told lawmakers at the Senate Finance Committee hearing.” MB: Gosh, sometimes it's convenient to fastidiously follow traditional rules. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., was not convinced by Bessent's sudden boy to propriety. She told him, “It’s been very clear you’re dodging this and you’re trying to use it as an excuse. It’s just outrageous on behalf of the American public.”
Alan Rappeport of the New York Times: “Speaking at a Senate Finance Committee hearing, [Treasury Secretary Scott] Bessent said that he had spoken with [Bill] Pulte, who is the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, [whom Donald Trump has chosen to act as national intelligence director] and that he looked forward to working with him both on housing matters and on 'several pressing issues on Iran.'... At a kickoff dinner [last September] at the Executive Branch, a members-only club in Georgetown started by the president’s eldest son and a few of his allies, Mr. Bessent confronted Mr. Pulte for allegedly trash-talking him to the president. Asked on Wednesday by Senator Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina, if it was true that Mr. Bessent threatened to punch Mr. Pulte in the face, Mr. Bessent [replied].... “I actually said I was going to kick his ass.'...”
~~~ Marie: Akhilleus wrote a Debbie Downer post in yesterday's Comments section. I endorse his pessimism. I see signs almost every day that the country is barreling into the abyss. Donald Trump's plan is to destroy the democratic aspects of our governing system. Trump has plenty of accomplices. One obvious accomplice is Bill Pulte, to whom Trump has just handed the nation's top secrets (BTW, word is that Pulte doesn't have any security clearance). Pulte has already rifled through confidential mortgage docs to find dirt on Trump's "enemies"; just think what he can do with national security secrets. Or national security "threats": why, he'll be finding terrorists in every district that votes heavily Democratic. He will either take over administration of these voting district or he will just stop everybody in those districts from voting. You think Sen. Jon Ossoff (D) will keep his seat just because the majority of Georgia voters would choose him? Ha! Fulton County, here we come! Unless there is some institutional revolution, Trump and Co. will prevail.
Marie: Markwayne has been complaining that New Jersey did not cooperate enough with the DHS. I didn't hear where he said anything about the DHS not even minimally cooperating with New Jersey. ~~~
~~~ Tracey Tully of the New York Times: “Gov. Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey said Wednesday that federal immigration officials were continuing to bar her from entering a detention center in Newark, raising 'serious questions about what is happening behind its walls.' Ms. Sherrill noted that she had met Tuesday evening with relatives of migrants being held at the Delaney Hall detention center, which has become a focal point of protest against ... [Donald] Trump’s immigration crackdown. She said that the relatives had shared 'heartbreaking reports of unsafe, inhumane and unconstitutional conditions' inside the 1,000-bed jail. 'Detainees have requested to meet with me,' Ms. Sherrill, a Democrat, wrote in a social media post, 'and I want to meet with them.'”
Robert Jimison & Megan Mineiro of the New York Times: “The House on Wednesday voted to direct ... [Donald] Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from the conflict with Iran or win approval from Congress to continue the war, after four Republicans sided with Democrats in a striking sign of growing opposition to a military campaign now in its fourth month. Adoption of the resolution was a remarkable rebuke to Mr. Trump and his handling of the conflict, after he has repeatedly dismissed any effort by Congress to curb his power and as the G.O.P. has largely ceded its prerogatives to do so, deferring to him time and again. Republicans had abruptly postponed the vote two weeks ago, recognizing that they did not have sufficient votes to defeat the measure and wanting to spare themselves and the president the affront. But they made no headway over the ensuing days in winning converts, as the conflict has dragged on and Mr. Trump has made little progress toward ending it. G.O.P. leaders were unable to delay the vote any longer because Democrats had invoked the War Powers Resolution, which requires consideration of such measures within a limited period of time.” The AP's report is here. ~~~
~~~ Robert Jimison of the New York Times: “The four [House Republicans who broke with Mr. Trump] hail from different factions within the G.O.P.; two are staunch conservatives with libertarian views that include opposition to foreign military intervention, while the other two are more mainstream Republicans from competitive districts where backing for the war could be a political liability. All of them expressed a firm belief that Congress, not the president alone, must weigh in on the scope and objectives of the war.... Here is a look at who defected, and why. Warren Davidson of Ohio..., Tom Barrett of Michigan..., Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania..., [and] Thomas Massie of Kentucky.”
Robert Jimison of the New York Times: “Defying Republican leaders, the House voted on Wednesday to take up a bill to impose sweeping new sanctions on Russia and provide additional aid to Ukraine, after a bloc of G.O.P. defectors joined Democrats in an effort to ratchet up pressure on Moscow more than four years into the war. The bill, which still must win passage in the House, faces a difficult path to enactment, given divisions in the Senate over a sanctions package and objections from the White House.... [Donald] Trump has repeatedly signaled he does not want Congress constraining his flexibility to negotiate directly with Moscow, and could veto the legislation if it reaches his desk. Still, the 218-to-204 vote to take it up, in which six Republicans and one independent who normally votes with them crossed party lines to side with Democrats, sent a clear signal of bipartisan pressure on the matter. It added to a growing list of issues on which the Republican-led Congress has in recent weeks shown a greater willingness to challenge Mr. Trump, including the war with Iran, his push to fund a new White House ballroom and a bid to create a federal fund to benefit his political allies.” The Hill's report is here. ~~~
~~~ MEANWHILE, Across the Hall. Annie Karni of the New York Times: “The Senate voted along party lines on Wednesday to take up Republicans’
$70 billion immigration crackdown bill, but several G.O.P. senators
suggested they would not allow it to pass without new language barring ... [Donald] Trump from creating a fund to compensate his political allies.... Before bringing it up, Republicans followed through on a decision they made late last month to jettison $1 billion in security funds for Mr. Trump’s ballroom
and other White House renovations, which had drawn a mini-revolt within
his party.... The vote set the stage for a lengthy vote-a-thon on a
range of issues
that is expected to culminate on Thursday in Senate passage of the
immigration enforcement bill, which Republicans are pushing through
Congress using special procedures that shield it from a filibuster. To
do so, they will need near unanimity to overcome united Democratic
opposition.”
~~~~~~~~~~
California Elections Results. Jill Cowan & Tim Balk of the New York Times update California election results. The top two candidates for the top two races -- governor and L.A. mayor -- have not yet been called.
~~~~~~~~~~
Israel/Lebanon, et al. Eprat Livni of the New York Times: “Israel and Lebanon have agreed to renew their cease-fire and work toward a 'comprehensive' agreement, the two nations announced on Wednesday in a joint statement with the United States. While the announcement may help to remove an obstacle in the talks between the United States and Iran, the agreement depends on the cooperation of Hezbollah, the Iran-backed Lebanese militant group fighting Israel. Hezbollah is not a part of, or controlled by, the Lebanese government and is not a party to either set of negotiations. 'The cease-fire is contingent on a complete cessation of Hezbollah fire and the evacuation of all Hezbollah operatives from the South Litani Sector,' the statement said, referring to an area of southern Lebanon that borders Israel. Israeli troops have occupied this area since shortly after the militant group resumed fighting with Israel. Hezbollah began firing rockets across the border into northern Israel in support of Tehran on March 1, a day after the U.S.-Israeli strikes began on Iran. Israel then escalated the conflict....”

17 comments:
Bigger and Stupider
The Dumbass talking about how tall the reflecting pool is and keeping his battle area.
"Nevada’s DOJ Prosecutor Accused Of Wild Misconduct
President Donald Trump’s top Nevada prosecutor, Sigal Chattah, pushed to launch investigations at the behest of former clients and friends while repeatedly bypassing Justice Department orders recusing her from cases, according to three people with direct knowledge.
Chattah, a former Republican party official who took over the US attorney’s office in Nevada 14 months ago, also opened a probe targeting her past political foe, the three individuals said. It is one of many circumstances in which she’s leveraged her role to advance personal interests."
@Marie What a coincidence (?) - my Bank of America credit card was hacked about a week ago. What a pain! I have to say, the new card did come much faster than their notice to me had suggested, so there's that. Sorry this happened to you.
David S. Bernstein
"Team Of Rivals (For His Affection)
The rot in the administration is growing, as their protection from scrutiny winds down."
60 Minutes Hire
Rusty Foster
"Yesterday CBS’s Temu Leni Riefenstahl Bari Weiss fired everyone at 60 Minutes who had demonstrated they were willing to stand up to her and her paymasters David Ellison, his daddy Larry Ellison, and the Ellisons’ daddy Donald Trump. Then Weiss announced her new pick to lead the show: Nick Bilton.
The two reactions to this news were either “who?” or “him?” depending on how closely you followed tech journalism in the twenty-teens. If you weren’t following it, good call! Luckily you know a guy who was following it and regrettably that is me."
"Trump administration has separated dozens of children from their parents for a second time, AP finds"
The many hands in the cookie jar
Apparently a few people are talking about Hunter Biden calling out a lot of hypocrites.
"John Bolton reaches plea deal over mishandling of sensitive national security documents"
From the article linked above: "... executive order on Wednesday that strips job protections from nearly 8,000 federal workers who are in policy-making roles, making it easier for the administration to fire them ..."
Two things (and there are more, but it's an endless list);
1. When the political appointees can fire all the senior career employees for no reason (or just "insufficient support of the president's policies"), they are now all political. Self-preservation becomes the main priority of career leadership, which includes developing safe landing spots (Raytheon? any major regulated enterprise?). All knowledge and accountability systems become subject to the perceived whims of the fuhrer, whose policies are by definition correct. To modify a commie quote from the 60s, you get "one, two, many Irans" where "Iran" means megamistake following uninformed orders.
2. All data and information necessary for decision making becomes corrupt and useless, including outcome measurements (because, seniors falsify reports and engage in chronic blame avoidance). Ironically, people who establish such fuhrerprinzip systems claim to do so in large part to increase accountability for outcomes. The opposite results.
We know this. We learned it the hard way. We are not very good at learning, I suppose.
Okay, just a few thoughts...
Fat Hitler is instituting MORE tariffs? Because the first round worked so well. This is like a guy who, after beating his head against the wall and getting a splitting headache, decides to try beating his head against a rock face. "It was the wall. Too woke." Anyway, what 's the rationale now? Forced labor? Seriously? Hang on....Hahahahahahahahaha....Trump cares about human rights? There are jokes and then there are Fatty policies. Look, back when he was hawking shirts and ties ALL his stuff was made by slave labor in China. If slave labor was legal in this country, every one of this businesses would be first in line at the slave auctions every morning.
Then there's the puffy eye, the swollen, discolored hand, the shuffling waddle...but no biggie, he's in great shape. Best evah. We will never get a straight answer from these lying pudknockers. These are the screaming Mimis who were jumping up and down about transparency from the Biden people. See, transparency and truth are only requirements for Democrats. When this fat fucker is being lowered into a hole, we'll still be told he's in better shape than Obama.
What's next? Oh yeah, this business about how Fatty doesn't want his hands tied regarding his dealings with Russia....how do they put it? He..."has repeatedly signaled he does not want Congress constraining his flexibility to negotiate directly with Moscow". Which means he has to be the one to decide which hand to use when giving Putin a little tuggy. Another laugher.
Looks like Blanche has passed the test: actual law and justice, right out. Vengeance, self-dealing, crookedness, criminality, all good. He can now be the actual AG.
As for Pulte, he knows what his role is, and it has nothing to do with keeping the nation safe. It has to do with accumulating info that can be used to stick it to Fatty's enemies and/or make him money. That's it.
The plea agreement set up with John Bolton makes clear that Fat Hitler knows for a 100% true fact that sneaking off with secret documents is a CRIME. But only others can be held liable for it. He has total immunity, thanks so much, John Roberts, you incredible asshole.
Fatty has completely given up on any pretense of governing. From here on out it will be nothing but stuffing his pockets and fucking his enemies. And the enemies include all of us, so we need to be prepared for every dirty trick in the book come the midterms. He will abscond with ballot boxes, surround polling places with ICE thugs, declare martial law, whatever it takes to NOT LOSE. And Democrats are remiss to think he won't try something evil/unethical/illegal. I mean, why not? What's he got to lose? He can't be arrested or held liable for ANYTHING, and he'll issue blanket pardons to any of his goons who do his bidding. It's coming.
Oh, and here's a good one. Jill Biden has been making the rounds talking about her book. Referring to that terrible debate, she said that at one point she was afraid her husband might be having a stroke. Fatty heard this and sniffed that if she was any kind of a wife, and she really believed that, she should have been up on stage helping out. Right. Because first of all, she'd know exactly what to do to fix a stroke. Besides there were doctors on hand. Secondly, does this comment come from personal experience of having a loving, caring spouse who is there for her husband through thick and thin? His fucking wife "really doesn't care". And if Melanie was sitting in the audience and thought Fatty was having a medical emergency, she'd be like the Bette Davis character in "Little Foxes" who, as her husband is dying of a heart attack, makes sure to keep any life saving medication out of reach. Melanie would be on the phone to her lawyer to make sure joint assets were secured and safe from Fatty's greedy kids before her obese hubby hit the floor.
Anyway, that's twice now that I referred to a certain Orange Monster shuffling off this mortal coil. If I made it three times, would it work?
RAS,
Loved the Temu Leni Riefenstahl line. Also dug the Edward Bulwer-Lytton reference. It's pretty bad when the author of the most famously terrible bit of writing sends a message from the great beyond declaring Bilton a terrible writer. Also having him replaced by a rhesus macaque with brain damage sounded like a good idea. Good read.
The bruised hand probably happened when he hit Melany upside the face for not
bowing down deep enough. The puffy eye might have been when she hit back.
I don't even want to think about the shuffle probably being caused by a diaper full.
These are just my thoughts; no proof.
Bari Weiss - "she did warn us"
@Victoria D.: Victoria, I'm sorry you had to go thru this bank card folderol, too. I am encouraged to read that getting your card(s) back didn't take as long as BofA warned it would. I've figured out "things I can subsist on" for about a week. After that, I'll probably have to break down, go to the grocery store & hand over some greenbacks. Thankfully, none of them will have Trump's face on them.
Ending Woke
"The return of screwworm comes after the Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, launched by the Trump administration, last year cut funding for a project dedicated to monitoring and containing New World screwworm in Central America.
The funding was axed days before the U.S. ended a temporary suspension of cattle imports from Mexico, meaning livestock was allowed to cross the border without any of the monitoring previously funded by the U.S. Agency of International Development (USAID)."
Supremes reinstitute Jim Crow. Calling it out hits a nerve.
Marie - we have three BofA accounts, and for none of them do we have a bank credit or debit card. We use American Express for credit purchases, write checks on the BofA accounts to pay most bills. Becasue I have an old Credit Union account, we also have a Visa, because not everyone takes AmEx.
It is extremely difficult to recover fraudulent use of a bank debit card -- which is why we don't have them.
It is relatively easy to get AmEx to cancel a bad charge -- which is one of the reasons we keep it (my wife got it in the early 70s when she was a flight attendant, her airline required it. That was when many finance ops required fathers or husbands to co-sign. She was having none of that.)
My points are:
-- it is just as easy to have multiple accounts at BofA as to have just one, but when one of them gets tangled the other accounts still work
-- when you look at how low interest rates (on YOUR deposits) are, it is really not too expensive to keep your cash balances up to levels that get you free everything, if you can afford to sort of tie up some cash
-- you can limit fraud loss risk by not having debit cards
None of this is savvy thought out planning, just the way things evolved over decades. But when we sat down to review things last year, we found that this variety of accounts is just as easy as having single accounts, what with calculators to help balance the checkbook.
Post a Comment