September 30, 2026

Julie in Massachusetts catches Sen. Eric Schmitt preparing for his next committee hearing: ~~~


Trump Is a Drag -- Paxton. Theodore Schleifer of the New York Times: “Ken Paxton, the Republican nominee for Senate in Texas, told a group of conservative donors and lobbyists last week that ... [Donald] Trump’s midterm convention in Dallas had hurt Mr. Paxton politically, according to an audio recording obtained by The New York Times. The recording, which is muffled at times, captures Mr. Paxton being asked, 'Do you feel like he’s a little bit of a drag?' It is not clear from the audio whom the questioner is referring to. Mr. Paxton responds: 'So to be honest with you, the numbers — when we did that convention — it dropped our numbers. Everybody’s numbers dropped. Right now, yeah, not good.'... Mr. Paxton’s comments at the Washington fund-raiser echo other private whispers by Republicans that the party’s convention would not be helpful, given Mr. Trump’s sagging approval ratings. Since the gathering, the midterm outlook for Republicans has only darkened....” The link is a gift link. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Even during the fake convention, where he was supposed to be boosting Paxton, Trump said of the senatorial candidate, "Some may not like the way he dresses. I don’t. They may not like the way he talks. I can see that. You may not like the way he looks." So even Trump says Paxton is an ugly, sloppy, ill-spoken candidate, and that isn't even taking into account Paxton's long, scandal-plagued career, his impeachment by the state GOP-led house and other law enforcement actions against him, his infidelity to his wife, etc., etc. So he's the worst candidate imaginable. And yet Trump can drag him down further. Oh, did I mention Paxton owns a lot of real estate? See Talarico ad embedded below.

Mattathias Schwartz & Devlin Barrett of the New York Times: “The Justice Department on Wednesday accused two of Minnesota’s federal judges of engaging in misconduct for comments made to The New York Times about how their court handled the administration’s immigration surge in Minneapolis this winter. In a six-page complaint filed with the Judicial Council of the Eighth Circuit, which includes the Minnesota district, the department alleged that the judges’ comments violated ethics rules that limit what judges are allowed to say publicly, particularly on pending cases. It singles out Judge Patrick J. Schiltz and Judge John R. Tunheim, both of whom were quoted in the Times article. At a news conference on Wednesday, Attorney General Todd Blanche accused the judges of 'obvious bias' for giving interviews to The Times about the Trump administration’s immigration surge in Minnesota this winter. Judge Schiltz told The Times that the administration’s actions had 'created a grave threat to the rule of law.' Mr. Blanche called those comments 'overtly political.'” The link is a gift link.

Colby Smith of the New York Times: “The Federal Reserve’s internal watchdog found no evidence of illegal behavior or administrative misconduct associated with the central bank’s nearly $2.5 billion project to overhaul its headquarters in Washington, D.C., even as it concluded that the renovations were poorly managed and lacked sufficient budget constraints. In a sweeping 120-page report, the Fed’s independent inspector general on Wednesday provided the most comprehensive overview to date of what caused extensive cost overruns on the project, which has been underway since 2022. It identified a range of missteps, including the Board of Governors’ failure to obtain a total cost estimate until the work was well underway or to establish a 'guaranteed maximum price.'

“The project last year became a major front in ... [Donald] Trump’s campaign to pressure the Fed into lowering interest rates. Mr. Trump repeatedly criticized Jerome H. Powell, who served as Fed chair until May, for the cost overruns and frequently raised the question of whether he had committed fraud as he floated the idea of firing him. The Federal Reserve Act stipulates that the president can remove a sitting Fed official only 'for cause,' which has long been interpreted to mean gross negligence or a dereliction of duty. Mr. Trump’s attacks on Mr. Powell culminated in a criminal investigation led by the Justice Department over whether Mr. Powell misled Congress about the project.” The link is a gift link.

Marie: I suppose akaWendy has seen this ad, but I hadn't: ~~~

Patrick, citing a New Republic report, says the White House has "fixed" America.gov so it no longer contradicts the Dear Leader. Fact-checker Daniel Dale of CNN says the same. Related NYT story linked below.

Tennessee. Emily Cochrane of the New York Times: “A federal court on Wednesday ordered a pause on the execution of Christa Pike, convicted of the murder of a classmate in 1995, just hours before she was set to die by lethal injection in Nashville. Ms. Pike, 50, would have been the first woman executed in Tennessee in more than 200 years. But her lawyers mounted a fierce last-ditch campaign to stop the execution, arguing that her defense at her initial trial had failed to consider her history of child sexual abuse and neglect. The ruling came after the Supreme Court on Tuesday had declined to intervene in the execution. Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican, also denied a request to allow Ms. Pike to serve out the remainder of her life in prison. The office of Jonathan Skrmetti, Tennessee’s attorney general, quickly appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court after Wednesday’s ruling, calling it a 'technical issue' and vowing to 'advocate for the lawfully-imposed sentence.'” The link is a gift link.

Gerry Shih & Lior Soroka of the Washington Post: “A flight carrying about 180 passengers to Tel Aviv from Dubai made an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia on Wednesday after one of the pilots stabbed another and sought to hijack the plane before being subdued, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. One of the pilots 'apparently tried to crash the aircraft with everyone on board,' Netanyahu said in a video address, adding that he spoke to an Israeli passenger who, along with a crew member, 'managed to force their way into the cockpit, and together they subdued the pilot who had carried out the stabbing as he was trying to sabotage the plane’s systems.' Nearly all of the passengers on board were Israeli, Netanyahu added. All passengers arrived in Tel Aviv on an alternate Flydubai flight Wednesday evening....

“The suspect, the co-pilot who attacked the captain on the flight, was an Omani national, said an Israeli security official.... Videos filmed on the flight, circulating online, show two injured people lying on the aircraft floor, covered in blood and wearing oxygen masks.... Eyal Datz, 44, an Israeli filmmaker on the flight, said... the crew opened the cockpit door, and three Israeli passengers helped overpower the assailant and handcuffed him. Then, another person who was in the cabin took control of the plane....” Related NYT liveblog linked below.

U.K. Michael Shear of the New York Times: “Prime Minister Andy Burnham of Britain said Wednesday that his government believes Iran 'played a part' in the incident on Sunday at an air base used by American bombers in the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran.... Mr. Burnham told the BBC in an interview..., 'It remains an ongoing, complex and serious police investigation, and of course we are working closely with our colleagues in the United States of America.'”

~~~~~~~~~~

It's Show-and-Tell Day in Washington, D.C. Ian Duncan & Cat Zakrzewski & Shira Ovide of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump launched America.gov, a government chatbot for researching public services, as part of a day-long event featuring members of his Cabinet and tech executives. AI company leaders are also set to meet with him and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana).... Last week, it was disclosed that the federal government itself had been a victim [of rogue AI 'agents,'] with a handful of websites probed by AI agents deployed by ChatGPT maker OpenAI. Yet, even as the public’s concerns have grown and Democrats in Congress have pressed for regulation, Trump has largely dismissed the risk, calling it a 'hoax.'” MB: Of course he has. According to Art Intel, “Donald Trump and his family already hold millions of dollars in stock and business ventures tied directly to artificial intelligence and data centers.” (Also linked yesterday.) The link has been changed to a gift link. ~~~

     ~~~ The story has been updated. New Lede: “After weeks of Washington being gripped by a wave of fear about artificial intelligence gone awry, the Trump administration on Tuesday sought to reassure a skeptical public that it can embrace the technology — and trust the industry to police itself. Standing with the world’s richest and most powerful tech executives Tuesday outside the West Wing..., Donald Trump said that he and they had signed a voluntary accord intended to ensure the industry develops AI safely. Trump described the agreement as 'morally binding.' The text suggests that codifying its terms may make sense 'over time.' The agreement capped a day in which Trump sought to reinforce his pitch that AI is an engine of prosperity that should not be restrained by government.” A CNBC story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: An agreement signed by Donald Trump that is “morally binding” is worthless. 

     ~~~ Ha Ha. Chris Cameron of the New York Times: “A new A.I.-powered search tool that ... [Donald] Trump unveiled Tuesday to help Americans get information from the federal government provides facts that contradict false claims he has made about topics such as election fraud and immigration. In an event announcing the website’s launch, Mr. Trump said the tool was 'damn good' and would be 'one front door for every single question' someone could ask of the federal government. 'With America.gov..., everything will be answered easily and quickly,' [Mr. Trump said]. But the president would not like many answers that America.gov provides. Citing official government sources, the chatbot, which calls itself 'America,' fact-checks an extensive list of Mr. Trump’s most common false claims....

“According to America.gov: It is Americans, and not foreign companies, that pay for Mr. Trump’s import tariffs; U.S. elections are generally safe and secure and prosecuted cases of voter fraud are 'tiny' compared to the hundreds of millions of votes cast; Mr. Trump is wrong when he says that 25 million immigrants illegally crossed the border under his predecessor, President Joseph R. Biden Jr.; Consumer prices are not going down, as Mr. Trump frequently claims.” The link is a gift link. Read on. An ABC News story is here.

Paul Krugman: “For those of us who remember the giddy optimism that greeted the tech boom of the 1990s, the widespread negativity towards AI is astonishing.... Only 28 percent of Americans believe that AI technology should move full speed ahead. Everyone else wants it slowed down or stopped, temporarily or permanently. Of course, Donald Trump remains a huge booster. He believes that the public’s antipathy towards AI is just a marketing problem — and that he can solve that problem by forcing everyone to call it 'super intelligence'. But [a Wall Street] Journal poll also says that only 7 percent of Americans trust Trump’s leadership in regulating AI.... [There are good reasons to be very afraid of A.I.]... There is also, however, a more prosaic reasons for the public’s dislike of AI: This is a technology of, by and for oligarchs, with hardly any of the benefits trickling down to regular Americans.... Here we have a technology that is enriching a small number of people, but whose creators warn may destroy millions of jobs if not the world. And even the usual argument for pro-oligarch policies — job creation! — falls flat because hardly any jobs are being created even in the short run.”

The Fish Rots from the Head Down. David Gilmour of Mediaite: “... Donald Trump personally helped craft a series of taxpayer-funded TV ads promoting himself and his administration, including hand-picking some of the footage and imagery used in the spots, according to a new report. CNN reported Tuesday that a source revealed Trump was directly and creatively involved in the campaign, which has drawn criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike as it airs just weeks before the November midterms. Two Trump advisers told the network the commercials were produced in-house by Trump’s own video team, part of the communications operation responsible for promoting the administration’s message.” Thanks to RAS for the lead. MB: The CNN story is firewalled. You can read the whole CNN story on the link RAS provided, but I'm a little leery of the source, part of the archive.today "family." You can decide for yourself. I did open the link RAS provided, and my computer didn't blow up. Yet. (Also linked yesterday.)~~~

~~~ Steven Portnoy, et al., of ABC News: "The Trump administration used funds from the Department of Homeland Security to air TV ads featuring ... Donald Trump in recent days, according to sources familiar with the matter. Federal budget records indicate the money was moved into a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) account for 'commemorative events' on Sept. 19 and federal contract data shows that a contract of $20 million was awarded the next day to the LMD Agency, a Maryland-based advertising agency for a 'National Media Campaign.' Days later, the ads began airing.... Democrats on the Senate Appropriations Committee responded by sending a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin demanding he answer questions about the breakdown of the funds, whether the ads are expected to continue, and DHS's role in facilitating their airing." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Lisa Mascaro & Ali Swenson of the AP, published by the Independent (without crediting the AP): "The Department of Homeland Security has allocated $20 million toward campaign-style advertisements praising ... Donald Trump, drawing widespread backlash from both Republicans and Democrats who argue the move misuses taxpayer funds and likely violates anti-propaganda laws. In a letter sent Tuesday to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, two top Democratic senators stated that the money was drawn from Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' and was originally designated for U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 'We should not have to remind you that using government funding to create or air political ads like the ones that have been running over the last few days is illegal and a shockingly corrupt misuse of taxpayer dollars,' wrote Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, and Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee overseeing Homeland Security funding.

"Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, compared Trump's ads to those used by authoritarian former leader Viktor Orban of Hungary. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, said it 'shouldn’t be paid for with taxpayer dollars.'" ~~~

     ~~~ Marie BTW: During his AI speech yesterday, Trump boasted he did not accept his presidential* salary and complained that nobody gave him credit or showed him appreciation for that. He did not mention, of course, how he has monetized the presidency to the point that he and his family have raked in billions of dollars. Indeed, that $20 ad buy courtesy of Markwayne Mullin was a gift to Trump, one stolen from the American taxpayer. The $400,000 annual presidential* salary is comparative peanuts.

Headline: “The Kennedy Center was solvent when Trump took over. Then its finances collapsed.” Federica Cocco & Naema Ahmed of the Washington Post: “In the 19 months since ... [Donald] Trump took over the Kennedy Center, the institution has borrowed everything its bank would lend it, dipped into money donors had given on condition it never be spent, and written off pledges from supporters who stopped paying, according to confidential board documents and tax filings.... Trump said the center was 'losing hundreds of millions of dollars' when he took over, and his board has warned of 'bankruptcy.' It is true that when Trump took over, the center was in worse shape than it was in 2021, when it was flush with pandemic relief funds. But the old leadership handed over an institution that was better off financially than in most years before covid.” More on the Kennedy Center linked below.

Dan Mangan of CNBC: "A federal appeals court panel on Tuesday rejected a bid to pause sanctions imposed on two attorneys for ... Donald Trump over their handling of his $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service. The three-judge panel in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the attorneys, Alejandro Brito and Daniel Epstein, failed to show they were likely to succeed in arguing that Miami U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams lacked sufficient basis when she found the lawyers acted in bad faith in the civil suit. The panel also said the appeal was premature. The panel noted that Williams has not made a final decision on whether to grant a request by a group of former judges that she reopen the case — which was controversially settled out of court in May — and also has not decided a question about attorneys’ fees."

Will The Last One Out Please Shut Off the Lights. Erika Solomon, et al., of the New York Times: “U.S. forces formally withdrew from Iraq on Wednesday, ending a two-decade military presence that stoked years of devastating bloodshed and leaves behind a battered nation struggling to unshackle itself from its two most powerful, and now warring, allies. After toppling Saddam Hussein in 2003, the brutal dictator who ruled Iraq for nearly 24 years, American forces are making their second withdrawal from the country. The U.S. invasion and subsequent occupation, which ended in 2011, left a country reeling from sectarian bloodletting and militant insurgencies that cost nearly 4,500 U.S. lives and killed more than 115,000 Iraqis, according to the most modest counts. American forces ultimately returned three years later — this time to lead the fight against the Islamic State, the jihadist force that once seized swathes of Iraq and Syria and became notorious for its slaughter of Shiite Muslim Iraqis, public killings of hostages, and torture and enslavement of women from Iraq’s Yazidi minority.” The link is a gift link.

Tara Copp of the Washington Post: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is expected to announce deeper cuts to the military’s top ranks, reducing the total number of positions for general and flag officers by as much as 20 percent, officials told The Washington Post on Tuesday. The potential cuts could impact the careers of hundreds of current and rising military leaders following scores of firings and denied promotions that Hegseth has directed.... Former top defense officials, congressional Democrats and some fellow Republicans who are alarmed by his leadership purge and efforts to impose structural changes argue that the moves are politically motivated and threaten to do lasting harm.... Sen. Jack Reed (Rhode Island), the Senate Armed Services Committee’s top Democrat, issued a statement Tuesday chastising Hegseth for not publicly explaining his personnel moves to date and imploring him to consult with Congress before pursuing any additional reductions in the military’s senior officer ranks. 'The Secretary’s history of obfuscation around this issue gives us cause for skepticism,' Reed’s statement said, 'and it is his burden to dispel it.'”

Anushka Patil of the New York Times: “An Air Force major who was arrested after protesting ... [Donald] Trump has been recommended for a general court-martial, the most severe type of military trial.... An investigating officer who issued a report to the military convening authority also recommended that some charges related to prohibited partisan political activity be dismissed. The convening authority, typically a commander with the power to refer charges to a court-martial and assemble the court-martial itself, will decide on the recommendations. The recommendations are not binding, but it is rare in the military justice system for a convening authority to depart from them when making prosecutorial decisions.... Major Jason Watson was arrested in uniform on the steps of the Capitol in July as he called for the president’s impeachment. He has argued that the president has violated the Constitution, and that Mr. Trump and Vice President JD Vance should be removed from office. During his preliminary hearing, he told the court that he acted not out of partisanship but to uphold his oath to defend the Constitution.” The link is a gift link.

Trumpish Treachery, Ctd. George Conway puts it succinctly: "In a normal administration counterintelligence agents at the FBI would be investigating this photo. In this administration, the FBI director is in the photo." Michael Weiss, in the squeet Conway linked, explains. Thanks to RAS for the link. MB: Because nothing could make me watch Star Wars movies, I did not know the meaning of Mos Eisley, to which Weiss refers. My assistant Art Intel tells me it's a spaceport town, which is a "wretched hive of scum and villainy." That, to me, also is a fine description of the Trump White House. And, IMO, the FBI can still investigate why the FBI director is socializing with a suspected double agent. Since we already know, Kash drinks himself stupid(er), you have to suspect he's spilling secrets to Abedelaziz. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Garrett Graff reviews the latest scandals involving Kash Patel. Well worth the read. 

Edgar Sandoval & Hamed Aleaziz of the New York Times: “A man who was shot by an immigration agent during a traffic stop in Austin, Texas, this month was charged on Tuesday with assaulting a federal officer during that encounter. The man, Wilber Rafael Garces Perez, 28, was charged with one count of assaulting, resisting, interfering and impeding a federal officer, according to the criminal complaint filed Monday in the Western District of Texas. It adds that he struck an agent with his car’s mirror as he drove away from an attempted stop. He remains at a detention center in Texas. The complaint includes a mention that one of the agents was wearing a body camera, which captured some of the incident. The government provided still images of what unfolded, but the full footage has not been released. A spokeswoman for Mr. Garces Perez’s lawyer, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, said in a statement that the charges were surprising. Noting that a bullet remains lodged in Mr. Garces Perez’s body, the statement condemned the Department of Homeland Security’s actions.” The link is a gift link.

The New York Times liveblogged the Senate Judiciary Committee's interrogation of former Special Counsel Jack Smith. The link is a gift link. From the pinned item at 10:30 am ET: “Jack Smith, who as special counsel twice charged Donald J. Trump with criminal offenses after his first term, is appearing before members of Congress on Tuesday as Republicans vow to scrutinize his every word for possible prosecution. Republican lawmakers have urged that Mr. Smith face charges, claiming his answers about his investigations into Mr. Trump were misleading. Mr. Smith defended his actions in his opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, saying Mr. Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and unlawfully retained classified documents after leaving office. 'I will not be silenced by the continued threats of prosecution from the president or others,' he said. The former prosecutor denied there was any political motivation for the cases he brought. 'If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.'” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: The hearing adjourned at about 1:15 pm ET. At 1:00 pm ET, I read the NYT reporters' entries. The Republicans on the committee are disgraceful. They are shamelessly defend a known criminal at the same time they falsely accuse his would-be prosecutor of criminal malfeasance. This is not politics-as-usual. It's wanton character assassination. ~~~

~~~ Here's an example. That's Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) doing the questioning in the video embedded below. He thinks he's asking Smith a "Law & Order"/Jack McCoy gotcha question, then accuses Smith of perjuring himself. In fact, Schmitt has no idea WTF he's talking about, as Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) explains near the end of the video. Schmitt's mistake is pretty damned funny: ~~~

~~~ Update. Marie: I was scarcely the only person who enjoyed Schmitt's epic faceplant. It was the biggest story in D.C. Nobody told it better than Chris Hayes, who put the moment in context. (Oh, and watch the little smile Schmitt can't hold back when he thinks he has caught Jack Smith in a lie.) Highly recommended viewing: ~~~


     ~~~ Hayes' interview of Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) adds more insider info. that helps explain how the denouement went down. Schiff also notes that when Republicans hold these hearings to vilify Jack Smith, "they never contest the facts of [Trump's] guilt ... because they can't." ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Jack Smith remarked during the hearing that he did not understand why Republicans accused him of conducting a partisan investigation when his main witnesses against Donald Trump would have been ... Republicans. ~~~

     ~~~ Lawrence O'Donnell gives Schmitt the Joe McCarthy Award, though O'Donnell does concede that "the disgraced, alcoholic, lying madman Joe McCarthy actually had more dignity than Eric Schmitt" ~~~


     ~~~ Jeremy Roebuck of the Washington Post: “Former special counsel Jack Smith forcefully defended his derailed efforts to prosecute ... Donald Trump on Tuesday.... Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith rejected Republican assertions that his investigations of the then-former president were driven by partisanship or were used to improperly surveil GOP lawmakers during the Biden administration.... The proceeding quickly devolved into an opportunity for the former special counsel’s critics to deliver a public tongue-lashing. 'No matter what you say, there’s no legitimate basis for what you did,' committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said. Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri) piled on, telling Smith he 'will go down as a total dirtbag.'... The nearly four-hour flogging grew so intense that Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) marveled at the relentlessness of the Republicans’ message. 'This is gaslighting of the American people,' he said, telling Smith, 'I am so sorry that they’re attempting to put investigators on trial while ignoring the extraordinary conduct that that they are duty bound to really investigate.'” The link is a gift link. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ At 2:00 am ET today, the top story on the New York Times' online front page was titled, "As Jack Smith Testifies, a Senator's Accusation of Perjury Falls Apart." The subhead: "A Republican eager to prove the former special counsel was dishonest appeared to instead demonstrate his own confusion over basic facts." Here's the report, by Devlin Barrett & Charlie Savage; this is a gift link. ~~~

~~~ Marie: I'll have to admit that the only U.S. senator from Missouri whom I could name off the top of my head up until yesterday morning was this guy: ~~~


     ~~~ Now I can name all two of them. Congratulations, Missouri voters; you sure know how to pick 'em! ~~~

~~~ Kyle Cheney & Chris Marquette of Politico: “Armed with subpoena power in Congress and a friendly Justice Department on their side, Republican lawmakers have spent two years promising to expose former special counsel Jack Smith as the leader of an anti-Trump witch hunt that morphed into a full-blown attempt to take down the Republican establishment. Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri unsuccessfully sought to implicate Smith in a plot to attend a sporting event as a cover for investigating Trump election interference claims, then called him a 'dirtbag.' Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said the former prosecutor made him 'want to throw up in my mouth.' And Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, comparing him to 'Javert from “Les Mis,’” said Smith’s probe was 'the most egregious abuse of power in the history of the Department of Justice.” Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley insisted the hearing was 'not the end' of his investigative work, but the four-hour grilling had the feeling of finality.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Paul Campos republishes an essay by someone. I don't know who wrote it (maybe Campos did???), but it's a good, irreverent explanation of what Eric Schmitt was up to. It's been more than 50 years since Deep Throat (Mark Felt) said of Nixon's crew, "These are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand." And yet. And yet. It remains a rule of thumb when it comes to elected Republicans and their staffs.~~~

     ~~~ Don Moynihan tries to suss out what-all went down. Marie: In the course of his speculating, it become evident that there was a conspiracy -- not between Jack Smith & Fani Willis, of course, but within Right Wing World, where facts are instantly forgettable. Yesterday, Schmitt was a player in that conspiracy, and -- since facts don't matter -- Moynihan thinks his extraordinary gaffe might not hurt him much. To follow up on a comment by RAS yesterday, the whole incident turned into a bit of a feminist victory. It never dawned on Schmitt that Smith and his crew would have gone to a women's basketball game -- which he did. And Schmitt clearly was humiliated when another women -- Sen. Amy Klobuchar -- exposed his stupid failure to check facts. ~~~

     ~~~ Heather Cox Richardson reminds us, "The case [against Trump's attempt to retain the presidency after he lost the election] can be resumed once Trump is no longer president."

Jonathan Edwards of the Washington Post: “A bipartisan effort to ban the demolition of presidential memorials — including the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts — was blocked Monday night in the Senate by an objection from Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), who led the effort with fellow Democrats and Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), sought to pass the bill by unanimous consent, a procedure that allows a motion or action unless a single senator objects. On Tuesday, Merkley and Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) said they would work to pass the legislation in both chambers of Congress.... Earlier this month, [Donald] Trump warned that the performing arts venue could eventually be “ripped down” without his intervention. Hours later, he was photographed aboard Air Force One examining a large printout about the center whose partially visible title appeared to read 'Kennedy Center DEMOLIS[HED].'” (Also linked yesterday.)

Joseph Gedeon of the Guardian: “The US Senate on Tuesday evening rejected along mostly party lines a Democratic resolution that would have forced the state department to report to Congress on violence in the occupied West Bank, including the killings of nine American citizens by Israeli settlers or security forces over the last few years. The resolution, led by the Maryland Democrat Chris Van Hollen, would have given the state department 30 days to report to Congress on those deaths and on wider human rights conditions in the territory, including Israel’s detention of Palestinian children. The resolution failed to advance by a vote of 47 to 51. Pennsylvania senator John Fetterman, a Democrat, joined Republicans in voting against the resolution, while Kentucky Republican Rand Paul voted in favor.”

Rep. Baird in one of his happy places.
Alexei Koseff & Lydia Sidhom of the Washington Post: “House lawmakers spent $6.7 million of taxpayer money on meals and lodging last year — a 21 percent increase over 2024 — under a reimbursement program that doesn’t require them to provide receipts, a Washington Post analysis found. The program, launched three years ago, allows House members to supplement a $174,000 base salary that Congress has not raised in nearly two decades by expensing food and housing costs while in Washington on official business. The specifics of their spending are not disclosed. Members do not have to provide documentation and need only certify that they have incurred the eligible expenses when seeking reimbursements. The Senate created a similar program in 2025 to cover Washington living expenses, according to the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, though it requires senators to submit receipts.... Rep. Jim Baird (R-Indiana), who expensed more for lodging and meals than any other House member in each of the past two years, including $39,789 in 2025, did not respond to multiple attempts to speak with him." MB: Wow, Jim. Dot's a lotsa stops at Mangialardo's (best name ever for an eatery).

Abbie Van Sickle of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Tuesday gave ... [Donald] Trump a temporary victory on a central piece of his mass deportation agenda, agreeing the administration can, for now, resume rapidly deporting immigrants to countries other than their own. Although the justices cleared the way for the policy to continue, they also announced that the court would fast-track the case and hear oral arguments about it in December.... The one-page emergency ruling was unsigned and gave no vote count, as is typical in such cases. On the line in December will be Mr. Trump’s policy of sending people to countries where they have no ties, including nations that have faced allegations of human rights abuses. Among the countries migrants have been sent to are Liberia, Equatorial Guinea, Costa Rica, Honduras and the Central African Republic. The court’s three liberal justices noted that they would have denied the government’s request to resume the deportations.” The link is a gift link. An NBC News story is here. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Maybe one of the court reforms could be to deport the six confederate justices to the Central African Republic, where they would be left to rot in jail & the protein in their diets would be maggots. ~~~

~~~ Chris Geidner sees "A split-screen of the Supreme Court allowing Trump to expand his authoritarian efforts as appeals courts are increasingly supporting district courts’ accountability efforts." ~~~

~~~ Josephine Walker of Axios: Donald "Trump's administration on Monday filed its 41st application to the Supreme Court's shadow docket, a milestone that matches the total number of petitions it filed during his entire first term — in less than two years.... The record highlights how often the president has turned to SCOTUS to secure authority to temporarily revive policies blocked by lower courts.... '... the shadow docket, the emergency docket, is used and should be used for actual emergencies,' [Stephen Spaulding ... [of] the Brennan Center for Justice] says."

~~~~~~~~~~

New York. Mihir Zaveri of the New York Times: “A Staten Island judge on Tuesday dealt a major setback to Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s push to raise taxes on the wealthy, saying that the city had mishandled the rollout of a tax on high-end second homes and must start over. The judge, Wayne M. Ozzi of State Supreme Court on Staten Island, sided with a group of homeowners who had sued the city. The homeowners had argued that the Mamdani administration’s Department of Finance did not try hard enough to determine who should owe the tax before moving toward collecting it. 'Homeowners are being substantially harmed and penalized needlessly by D.O.F.’s method of implementing the tax law,' Justice Ozzi wrote. The lawsuit did not challenge the legality of the tax on second homes, also known as pieds-à-terre. Unveiled by Gov. Kathy Hochul in the spring and backed by the mayor, the tax was popular among voters and hailed by Mr. Mamdani’s supporters as a way to make good on his pledge to 'tax the rich.'” The link is a gift link. ~~~

     ~~~ Update. Mira Bhakta of the Hill: “New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s office filed an appeal on Tuesday following a Staten Island judge’s ruling that barred notices from being sent to homeowners affected by the pied-à-terre tax. A city official told The Hill the appeal invoked the 'auto stay,' which under New York law allows the city to continue with its implementation of the tax on second homes worth more than $5 million and puts Judge Wayne Ozzi’s ruling on hold.”

Bryon Noem.
Perhaps these are two of the
irreconcilable differences.
South Dakota Rachel Lerman of the Washington Post: “Former Homeland Security secretary Kristi L. Noem filed for divorce from her husband [Bryon Noem], according to court records, citing 'irreconcilable differences.' Noem submitted the filing in Hamlin County, South Dakota, in April.” ~~~

     ~~~ Julianne McShane of MS NOW: "Former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has filed for divorce from her husband of over three decades, Bryon Noem, six months after a tabloid published photos that appeared to show him wearing women’s clothing and fake breasts and reported that he maintained a secret online presence in which he communicated with adult performers."

~~~~~~~~~~

Middle East. The New York Times is live-updating developments following an in-flight altercation in the cockpit. The link is a gift link. From the pinned item at 6:15 am ET: “A clash in the cockpit of an airliner flying from Dubai to Tel Aviv Wednesday morning prompted Israel and Saudi Arabia to scramble fighter jets in fear of a hijacking, officials said. Passengers described to Israeli news outlets a terrifying melee that left one crew member bleeding from a stab wound and ended with his attacker subdued by passengers. The plane landed safely at a civil-military airport in Tabuk, in northwestern Saudi Arabia. The flight, FlyDubai Flight 1073, sent distress signals and abruptly reversed course near the Saudi-Jordanian border about two hours and fifteen minutes into its trip. Officials of three Israeli government agencies said it appeared that the pilot and co-pilot had gotten into a fight and one of them sent the distress signal.”

September 29, 2026

It's Show-and-Tell Day in Washington, D.C. Ian Duncan & Cat Zakrzewski & Shira Ovide of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump launched America.gov, a government chatbot for researching public services, as part of a day-long event featuring members of his Cabinet and tech executives. AI company leaders are also set to meet with him and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana).... Last week, it was disclosed that the federal government itself had been a victim [of rogue AI 'agents,'] with a handful of websites probed by AI agents deployed by ChatGPT maker OpenAI. Yet, even as the public’s concerns have grown and Democrats in Congress have pressed for regulation, Trump has largely dismissed the risk, calling it a 'hoax.'” MB: Of course he has. According to Art Intel, “Donald Trump and his family already hold millions of dollars in stock and business ventures tied directly to artificial intelligence and data centers.”

The New York Times is liveblogging the Senate Judiciary Committee's interrogation of former Special Counsel Jack Smith. The link is a gift link. From the pinned item at 10:30 am ET: “Jack Smith, who as special counsel twice charged Donald J. Trump with criminal offenses after his first term, is appearing before members of Congress on Tuesday as Republicans vow to scrutinize his every word for possible prosecution. Republican lawmakers have urged that Mr. Smith face charges, claiming his answers about his investigations into Mr. Trump were misleading. Mr. Smith defended his actions in his opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, saying Mr. Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and unlawfully retained classified documents after leaving office. 'I will not be silenced by the continued threats of prosecution from the president or others,' he said. The former prosecutor denied there was any political motivation for the cases he brought. 'If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.'” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: The hearing adjourned at about 1:15 pm ET. At 1:00 pm ET, I read the NYT reporters' entries. The Republicans on the committee are disgraceful. They are shamelessly defend a known criminal at the same time they falsely accuse his would-be prosecutor of criminal malfeasance. This is not politics-as-usual. It's wanton character assassination. ~~~

~~~ Here's an example. That's Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) doing the questioning in the video embedded below. He thinks he's asking Smith a "Law & Order"/Jack McCoy gotcha question, then accuses Smith of perjuring himself. In fact, Schmitt has no idea WTF he's talking about, as Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) explains near the end of the video. Schmitt's mistake is pretty damned funny: ~~~

     ~~~ Jeremy Roebuck of the Washington Post: “Former special counsel Jack Smith forcefully defended his derailed efforts to prosecute ... Donald Trump on Tuesday.... Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith rejected Republican assertions that his investigations of the then-former president were driven by partisanship or were used to improperly surveil GOP lawmakers during the Biden administration.... The proceeding quickly devolved into an opportunity for the former special counsel’s critics to deliver a public tongue-lashing. 'No matter what you say, there’s no legitimate basis for what you did,' committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said. Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri) piled on, telling Smith he 'will go down as a total dirtbag.'... The nearly four-hour flogging grew so intense that Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey) marveled at the relentlessness of the Republicans’ message. 'This is gaslighting of the American people,' he said, telling Smith, 'I am so sorry that they’re attempting to put investigators on trial while ignoring the extraordinary conduct that that they are duty bound to really investigate.'” The link is a gift link.

Jonathan Edwards of the Washington Post: “A bipartisan effort to ban the demolition of presidential memorials — including the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts — was blocked Monday night in the Senate by an objection from Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), who led the effort with fellow Democrats and Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), sought to pass the bill by unanimous consent, a procedure that allows a motion or action unless a single senator objects. On Tuesday, Merkley and Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) said they would work to pass the legislation in both chambers of Congress.... Earlier this month, [Donald] Trump warned that the performing arts venue could eventually be “ripped down” without his intervention. Hours later, he was photographed aboard Air Force One examining a large printout about the center whose partially visible title appeared to read 'Kennedy Center DEMOLIS[HED].'”

The Fish Rots from the Head Down. David Gilmour of Mediaite: “... Donald Trump personally helped craft a series of taxpayer-funded TV ads promoting himself and his administration, including hand-picking some of the footage and imagery used in the spots, according to a new report. CNN reported Tuesday that a source revealed Trump was directly and creatively involved in the campaign, which has drawn criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike as it airs just weeks before the November midterms. Two Trump advisers told the network the commercials were produced in-house by Trump’s own video team, part of the communications operation responsible for promoting the administration’s message.” Thanks to RAS for the lead. MB: The CNN story is firewalled. You can read the whole CNN story on the link RAS provided, but I'm a little leery of the source, part of the archive.today "family." You can decide for yourself. I did open the link RAS provided, and my computer didn't blow up. Yet. ~~~

~~~ Steven Portnoy, et al., of ABC News: "The Trump administration used funds from the Department of Homeland Security to air TV ads featuring ... Donald Trump in recent days, according to sources familiar with the matter. Federal budget records indicate the money was moved into a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) account for 'commemorative events' on Sept. 19 and federal contract data shows that a contract of $20 million was awarded the next day to the LMD Agency, a Maryland-based advertising agency for a 'National Media Campaign.' Days later, the ads began airing.... Democrats on the Senate Appropriations Committee responded by sending a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin demanding he answer questions about the breakdown of the funds, whether the ads are expected to continue, and DHS's role in facilitating their airing."

Trumpish Treachery, Ctd. George Conway puts it succinctly: "In a normal administration counterintelligence agents at the FBI would be investigating this photo. In this administration, the FBI director is in the photo." Michael Weiss, in the squeet Conway linked, explains. Thanks to RAS for the link. MB: Because nothing could make me watch Star Wars movies, I did not know the meaning of Mos Eisley, to which Weiss refers. My assistant Art Intel tells me it's a spaceport town, which is a "wretched hive of scum and villainy." That, to me, also is a fine description of the Trump White House. And, IMO, the FBI can still investigate why the FBI director is socializing with a suspected double agent. Since we already know, Kash drinks himself stupid(er), you have to suspect he's spilling secrets to Abedelaziz.

~~~~~~~~~~

Ian Duncan of the Washington Post: Today, the Trump administration will seek “to convince a skeptical public that the nation is ... about to embark on a tech-powered 'golden age.'... Donald Trump will deliver a speech launching America.gov, a new portal for accessing public services, part of a day-long event featuring members of his Cabinet and tech executives. AI company leaders are also set to meet with the president and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana).... Even as the public’s concerns have grown and Democrats in Congress have pressed for regulation, Trump has largely dismissed the risk, calling it a 'hoax.'” The link is a gift link. ~~~

     ~~~ Yes, yes. What could possibly go wrong? ~~~

     ~~~ Ramon Vargas of the Guardian (September 27): “Bill Gates has called on the US’s federal legislators and law enforcers to regulate the development of artificial intelligence (AI), saying in an interview airing on Sunday that the technology left unchecked could cause 'a billion deaths' and 'no one thinks self-regulation is enough'. 'You need law enforcement and the politicians to get into the discussion about what safeguards and monitoring look like,' the Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist said to Kristen Welker, the NBC Meet the Press host. 'And that has to be a required thing.'” ~~~

     ~~~ Gerrit De Vynck of the Washington Post: “ChatGPT-maker OpenAI canceled the planned launch of a new artificial intelligence model after it was found to take actions beyond the instructions it received and not accurately communicate to human users what it did. The cancellation comes just days after OpenAI said it would pause development of new highly capable AI models out of concern that the company doesn’t have appropriate safeguards to keep the technology from behaving in unintended ways.... The cancellation of the new AI model, along with a freeze at the company on training advanced new models, underscore the debate over safety that has roiled the AI industry in recent weeks. Prominent researchers and chief executives have warned that their companies don’t fully know how to keep cutting-edge AI under control.... OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman joined calls from rival company Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to slow down development of AI to allow safety systems to catch up. Despite widespread backing inside the AI industry, the proposal has been rejected by ... Donald Trump.”

Ana Swanson of the New York Times: “The Trump administration imposed an import ban on some Canadian products, including alcohol, dairy products and motorcycles, at 12:01 a.m. on Tuesday. The move was the latest offensive in a vicious trade fight ... [Donald] Trump has picked with Canada. Though the bans affect just a tiny proportion of Canada’s exports to the United States, they are a sign of how much the relationship between two formerly close political and economic allies has unraveled. On Monday, U.S. officials released a notice saying Canadian products including whey protein, molasses, nonalcoholic beer, wine, vermouth and a variety of liquor would be 'unconditionally rejected' by U.S. Customs and Border Protection starting at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday. The ban comes on top of 50 percent tariffs that Mr. Trump slapped on about 5 percent of Canadian goods last month, a move that prompted Canada’s prime minister, Mark Carney, to hit back 'dollar for dollar' on a range of U.S. imports.” The link is a gift link.

We're Trumplodytes & Proud of It. Brad Plumer & Maxine Joselow of the New York Times: “The Trump administration on Monday finalized its plan to significantly weaken fuel efficiency standards for automobiles, scaling back Biden-era rules meant to reduce gasoline consumption and speed the shift to electric vehicles. Under the new rules from the Transportation Department, automakers will be required to achieve an average fuel efficiency of 34.9 miles per gallon for new cars and light trucks in model year 2031. That’s far below the standard of 50.4 miles per gallon set by the Biden administration.... [Donald] Trump portrayed the change as a way to lower car prices for consumers, as affordability has become a major issue in the coming midterm elections. He posted on social media over the weekend that the new rules marked a 'BIG DAY FOR AMERICAN AUTO WORKERS AND CAR BUYERS.' But critics said that less efficient vehicles could cost consumers more at the pump in the long run. U.S. gasoline prices have spiked because of the conflict in the Middle East, with the national average price for unleaded gas near $4.50 per gallon, up more than 40 percent since this time last year.” The link is a gift link. (Also linked yesterday.)~~~

     ~~~ Todd Frankel of the Washington Post: “The average new vehicle price in 2031 should be reduced by $1,289 due to the weaker fuel economy standards, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which drafted the regulation.... Trump touted the new standard in a social media post Saturday, writing: 'That means LOWER PRICES, saving families thousands on a new, beautiful, and safe car.' Analysts were doubtful that car shoppers should expect $1,300 price cuts from the new regulations — and any savings would be hard to notice, with average new vehicle prices currently hovering around $50,000.... Jessica Caldwell ... [of] Edmunds [said] ... any savings from weaker fuel economy standards would probably go to offset [Trump's] tariffs first ... [and will not be passed along to consumers].” (Also linked yesterday.)

Brad Plumer & Claire Brown of the New York Times: A March 11, 2025 letter from a coal trade group to Energy Secretary Chris Wright warned that “roughly one-third of the nation’s coal-burning power plants were scheduled to close within five years.... The trade group, America’s Power, proposed [that t]he Energy Department could deploy rarely used emergency powers to force them to stay open longer. Two months later, the Trump administration began doing exactly that. The letter, which has not been previously reported, reveals some of the earliest known discussions about a move that experts have called an extraordinary intervention into the nation’s energy markets. Since May 2025, the Energy Department has repeatedly issued emergency orders to keep nine coal-burning units at six plants operating long past their scheduled retirement dates, saying the facilities are needed to prevent looming blackouts. The orders have sometimes come over the protests of the plant’s owners and are expected to cost ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars. A federal appeals court has already struck down one order, ruling that it overstepped the law.” The link is a gift link.

Kevin Breuninger of CNBC: “... Donald Trump on Monday announced a steel-making company’s plan to invest about $15 billion to build what would be the largest plant of its kind in U.S. history. The Oval Office announcement with Mesabi Metallics came just weeks before the November midterm election, which is poised to be shaped by Americans’ increasingly sour views of Trump’s handling of the economy. The steel plant is planned to be built in Iowa and aims to begin production in 2030, a White House official told CNBC on condition of anonymity ahead of the Oval Office event.... Mesabi Metallics, based in Nashwauk, Minnesota, told CNBC the project will deliver '100% American steel: mined, melted and poured in Minnesota and Iowa.'” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ You won't be surprised to learn there's more to the story: ~~~

     ~~~ Katie Rogers & Farrah Stockman of the New York Times: “The project in Iowa is one of several job-creation announcements Mr. Trump is expected to make as he traverses the country. He will travel to several reliably conservative states this week, including Oklahoma and Alabama.... In the Oval Office on Monday, Mr. Trump, several cabinet members and Iowa Republicans said the project would remind voters that Mr. Trump’s policies have created jobs.” The link is a gift link.

     ~~~ Marie: It's interesting that “Mesabi Metallics, based in Nashwauk, Minnesota, told CNBC the project will deliver '100% American steel: mined, melted and poured in Minnesota and Iowa.'” -- Interesting because Rogers & Stockman report that “Mesabi Metallic is owned by Essar Group, a Mumbai-based conglomerate controlled by one of India’s wealthiest families.” So, if the project is built and gets up and running, I assume it will create American jobs. But any profits will go to India. AND, the Times reporters write, the project “has been supported by EXIM Bank, a U.S. federal import-export bank that announced it would extend loans to the company worth up to $10 billion. Some analysts consider the EXIM loan to be risky, because Mesabi has faced financial problems and significant delays over the years. Alec Varsamis, a spokesman for EXIM, said that Mesabi had so far been granted a $770 million loan for the iron-ore mine in Minnesota.... The company filed for bankruptcy protection in 2016....” ~~~

     ~~~ Oh, and this: Mesabi “hired Jason Miller, a longtime Trump adviser, as its lobbyist, paying him at least $240,000.... The government of India also hired Mr. Miller’s company, paying $150,000 per month for “strategic counsel, tactical planning and government relations assistance on policy matters before the U.S. government.'... On Monday, Mr. Miller said in a text message that he had stopped his work as a lobbyist for Mesabi.... He has since joined the administration as an unpaid special government employee. He was not present in the Oval Office.” CNBC's Breuninger also notes some caveats. IOW, it looks to me as if this whole Iowa steel plant thing is an inside job that may be a mirage, and if it's not, could leave a taxpayer-supported bank holding the bag. That is, it's another Trump scam aimed at garnering votes for his allies.... “'In any other administration, this would be treated as a monumental scandal,' [Robert] Weissman [of Public Citizen] said. 'But in this one, it’s just another day.'”

Another Trumpy Election Stunt Quashed. Patrick Marley of the Washington Post: “A federal judge on Monday blocked the Federal Emergency Management Agency from withholding anti-terrorism funds from local governments that don’t change how they run elections. It marked the latest blow to the Trump administration’s attempts to rewrite election rules. In June, FEMA made counterterrorism grants available but said it would withhold 20 percent of the funding from states and local governments that didn’t agree to use a federal database to check the citizenship status of voters, make plans to stop using certain types of voting equipment and modify other aspects of how they run elections.” The Democracy Docket report is here.

This Was the Plan. Jen Fifield & Peter Elkind of ProPublica: "... the [Trump] administration initially floated an idea that would have virtually shut down mail voting: requiring all ballots to be delivered exclusively through certified mail. The proposal — which would have required voters to be home and sign for delivery of their ballots — was ultimately abandoned, after vehement Postal Service objections that it would have been impossible to execute. Even after the idea fizzled, Postal Service officials were cut out of crucial conversations as the Trump administration moved forward with what became the final executive order.... Trump’s order would have forced postal workers to serve as gatekeepers, deciding which ballots would be delivered and which wouldn’t. Beyond that, it would have inexplicably handed authority over the plan’s execution to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who has no formal oversight over the Postal Service. Inside the Postal Service, which is overseen by a bipartisan Board of Governors, deliberations on whether to comply with the order stretched on for weeks. (Also linked yesterday.)

     ~~~ (Stewart's takedown of Susan Collins is classic.)

I Approve This Message. Paul Krugman: “Democrats — and everyone who believes in rule of law — are, rightly, outraged by the fact that the U.S. government just effectively reran a Trump campaign ad from 2024. My guess is that they probably also hope that Trump runs more such ads, and not just as a basis for future prosecutions. I mean, the ad reminds voters that Trump is effectively on the ballot, which is all to the good given his approval rating. Furthermore, the ad has Trump promising to 'expel the warmongers,' which is an ironic message given” the approval rating of Trump's Iran war. ~~~

~~~ Heather Cox Richardson has a good deal more to say about Trump's ad & related matters. For instance, "On Friday the administration announced it is refusing to spend about a billion dollars Congress appropriated for programs that help the American people — a refusal the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) says is illegal — and on Saturday, Trump used taxpayer money for his own vanity ads." MB: I checked Richardson's link to a GAO release; it reads, "A pocket rescission is illegal...." And that's that.

~~~ Once He Was A Humble Caddy. Not Anymore. Isabel Keane of the Independent: “White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino is facing fierce backlash — even from fellow Republicans — over a social media post depicting him in a tuxedo, sloshing champagne with some glamorous party pals as Americans grapple with a deepening cost-of-living crisis linked to the Iran War and the Trump administration’s tariffs. Scavino shared the apparent AI-generated video depicting him and who appears to be his second wife, Erin Elmore, and Lara Trump, grinning in ballgowns while they are pushed on a gold luggage cart through the White House by Eric Trump to Pitbull’s 'Don’t Stop the Party.' Gold confetti falls before a jubilant ... Donald Trump enters the scene.... [Despite widespread criticism,] Scavino appeared to lean into the controversy by resharing another AI-generated video that showed a rowdy party after the State Dinner at the White House.”

Erik Wemple of the New York Times: “Three news outlets that were barred from the White House this month — CNN, MS NOW and Politico — asked a federal court on Monday to extend their access to the grounds and protect their participation in pool coverage. 'The White House’s words and actions leave little doubt that it will immediately reinstitute a complete ban of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO if allowed the opportunity,' the filing said. The outlets were barred from entry on Sept. 19 after ... [Donald] Trump cited their 'constant “reporting” FAKE NEWS!' and called for the ban in a social media post. Two days later, they sued in federal court in Washington to have their access restored. Judge Timothy J. Kelly ruled last week that the White House had not given the outlets proper notice of the ban and issued a two-week order restoring their access to the White House grounds. That order is set to expire on Oct. 8.” The link is a gift link.

“October Is Cybersecurity Awareness Month.” Dustin Volz, et al., of the New York Times: “The theft by a criminal hacking group of reams of sensitive personal data involving potentially tens of thousands of former and current F.B.I. employees is emerging as one of the worst breaches of sensitive government information, leaving the bureau rushing to protect its personnel as a deadline looms. Nearly a week after the group, known as ShinyHunters, revealed it had pilfered intimate details about bureau personnel from the agency’s jobs portal and threatened to leak them online, F.B.I. investigators are still piecing together how the breach took place and the total damage. The hack appears to have swept up home addresses, Social Security numbers, secretive job assignments and much more.... Some are already comparing it to China’s breach of more than 20 million records from the Office of Personnel Management over a decade ago.... Many F.B.I. employees first learned about the hack when news reports about it surfaced on Tuesday, according to current and former officials. The next day, F.B.I. staff received an email reminding them that October is cybersecurity awareness month....” The link is a gift link. (Also linked yesterday.)

Everything Is Going Very Smoothly. Devlin Barrett, et al., of the New York Times: “Andrew Bailey, a deputy director of the F.B.I., said on Monday that he would leave the job after a little more than a year, the second such departure amid the turbulence in federal law enforcement under the Trump administration. Mr. Bailey said on social media that he was stepping down from his post, part of an unusual three-person leadership arrangement, 'to return to my family in Missouri.'... In recent months, people familiar with the inner workings of the agency have described a rocky arrangement between Mr. Patel and his two deputy directors, Mr. Bailey and Christopher Raia, a longtime F.B.I. agent and manager. Mr. Patel and Mr. Bailey did not get along, and often went long stretches without speaking to each other....” The link is a gift link. An ABC News story is here. (Also linked yesterday.)

Jeremy Roebuck & Perry Stein of the Washington Post: “Another prominent Trump loyalist working on the wide-ranging conspiracy investigation in Florida into ... Donald Trump’s political foes has abruptly left the probe..., marking the latest departure in a high-profile inquiry that has become a central focus for the administration and its allies. Kurt Olsen — who before joining to the so-called 'grand conspiracy' investigation in June had served several months as Trump’s election security czar — tendered his resignation from the Justice Department on Monday.... Two ... people said Olsen had become frustrated by pressure from Justice Department officials in Washington to increase the pace of the probe and secure grand jury indictments. [A] third person, who disputed that description, said Olsen left after issues arose with his security clearance that prevented his further involvement.” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: If you read on, you just might be tempted to conclude that this whole Trumpity witch hunt is a hoax. Mind you, Olsen was a true believer. From the WashPo report: “Olsen had been working in the White House, investigating Trump’s baseless claims that the 2020 election was stolen and had played a central role in initiating the FBI’s ongoing investigation into the vote count in Fulton County, Georgia, which was pivotal to Trump’s loss that year.” So when you lose this kind of guy, it's kind of game over, despite the fact that the “investigation” is continuing.

Michael Shear of the New York Times: “The counterterrorism police in Britain on Monday said that five men arrested Sunday near an air base were being released on bail, an unexpected development in what officials originally said was a major incident involving a possible terrorist act.... Laurence Taylor, who leads Britain’s counterterrorism police, said in a brief statement to reporters Monday afternoon that the men would remain under investigation and would be subject to 'stringent conditions on their movement and contact with others.' But their release raised new questions about what happened near the base, how the men managed to drive three vans so close to an area where American bombers are stationed and whether the British Army’s bomb disposal unit had failed to find any evidence after examining the vehicles for more than 24 hours.” The link is a gift link. Related story linked yesterday. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Marie: I don't know how long the pirated video embedded here will stay up, but at the top of her show last night, Rachel Maddow pulled together a number of very recent stories that gives a more big-picture understanding of Trump administration ops. (If this video dies, you might be able to find another one on the YouTubes): ~~

Lauren Lumpkin of the Washington Post: “The Education Department will scrap Biden-era Title IX rules that sought to bolster nondiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity, officials announced Monday, marking a return to rules from the first Trump administration. The regulations, initially released in 2020, outline how schools must handle reports of sexual misconduct, including setting a stricter definition for what constitutes sexual harassment and giving more due process rights to those accused. The rules, which take effect Tuesday, will not change much for schools. The Trump administration has been enforcing its own rules, including targeting schools that allow transgender athletes to play on girls’ and women’s sports teams, since the president took office last year.” (Also linked yesterday.)

Carl Hulse of the New York Times: “The Senate on Monday approved a sweeping remake of collegiate sports regulations in an effort to restore stability to an athletic landscape that has been upended by constant transfers, frequent shifts in conference membership and an infusion of money from wealthy boosters eager to lure top talent. Known as the Protect College Sports Act, the bill passed by an overwhelming bipartisan vote of 77 to 22, making it one of the last major pieces of business to be tackled by lawmakers before the midterm elections. It was a bid by Congress to lay out significant new rules and standards governing popular college sports.... Authors of the legislation, which faces an uncertain future in the House, said aggressive congressional intervention was necessary because a series of legal rulings had sowed chaos in college sports.But it has run into fierce opposition from Black lawmakers and others who say the measure restricts opportunities for players, many of them Black, while doing little to hold down the pay or mobility of top coaches.... Democratic opponents also were unhappy with the lack of clarity about future collective bargaining.” The link is a gift link. ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: About that “uncertain future in the House”: it's a certainty the bill won't be passed before the November election because Bible Mike sent the members home a couple of weeks back so they wouldn't get to impeach Drunk Pete. In addition, Hulse writes, “The measure is strongly opposed by members of the Congressional Black Caucus.”

Abbie Van Sickle of the New York Times: “Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said on Monday that he will not take part in a major climate-change lawsuit scheduled to be heard next week by the Supreme Court. The one-sentence announcement from the clerk of the Supreme Court provided no reason for the justice’s recusal. Justice Alito has faced pressure from environmental and court watchdog groups to step aside because he owns stock in two oil companies, and he flew on the private jet of an investor in a company involved in the dispute. The case could determine whether oil companies face billions of dollars in potential liability for damages from climate change. It is the first matter scheduled to be argued before the court when the justices return to the bench on Monday following their annual summer break.” The link is a gift link. MB: Insufferable Sam probably counted the votes and determined that the nays have it, so he's good. ~~~

     ~~~Lesley Clark & Alex Guillén of Politico: “A spokesperson for the court as recently as May had said that Alito wouldn’t recuse because he didn’t have a 'financial interest in any party' involved in Suncor and that he was advised by the court’s legal counsel that 'his recusal is not required.' Alito did recuse himself when the court turned away an appeal from the companies in the ... case in 2023. But that recusal came as the court on the same day rejected appeals in similar cases involving other companies.... The court spokesperson said earlier this year that Alito had 'inadvertently recused' himself in the earlier ... case 'because it was considered at the same time as other cases where the justice did have a financial interest in the parties.'” MB: It seems a bit odd that a justice would get mixed up and accidentally recuse himself from a case in which he supposedly had no conflict-of-interest, but that's his story. Now, at the last minute, he's recusing himself from the same matter -- again. Another accident?

In a liveblog, the New York Times is tracking Hurricane Polo. The link is a gift link. From the pinned item at 5:30 am ET: “Hurricane Polo made landfall in Baja California in northwestern Mexico late Monday, bringing life-threatening winds and setting off dangerous flash flooding, the National Hurricane Center said. The storm had approached the peninsula on Monday as a major hurricane and may stay near that strength as moves across the state of Baja California Sur. Weakening as it passes over the peninsula, the storm is expected to make a second landfall when it reaches mainland Mexico.... The storm is expected to bring 6 to 12 inches of rainfall to parts of Baja California Sur.”

~~~~~~~~~~

Texas. Jasmine Crockett Is a Sore Loser. Mary O'Bar of the Texan: “U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX-31) issued a slate of endorsements in various Texas races ahead of the midterm election, confirming her earlier indication that she would not be endorsing her former U.S. Senate primary opponent, state Rep. James Talarico (D-Austin), but would instead aid the Democratic Party by boosting other candidates. Crockett has endorsed in two Texas congressional contests, 14 Texas House races, one Texas Senate race, and a handful of county races via the Fueling Individual Rights Everywhere political action committee, which she founded. Crockett has not voiced such support for Talarico at the top of the ballot, consistent with her prior statements that she would instead endorse down ballot to bolster said races’ black voter turnout. Crockett previously alleged that the Democratic U.S. Senate primary was a 'racist race,' and has repeatedly shared that her plan for aiding the Democrats this cycle does not lie alongside an explicit endorsement of Talarico. She also noted that black voter turnout, which will be necessary for Talarico to succeed in November, will be positively impacted by her doing her 'best to uplift them and increase the voter participation.'”

Brazilian Elections. Ana Ionova & Adam Ellick of the New York Times: “As Brazilians prepare to head to the polls, the question looming over Latin America’s largest democracy is whether Mr. Trump will try to influence its presidential election next month. The American leader has not openly championed any Brazilian candidate. But the Trump administration has in more subtle ways lifted the right-wing challenger, Flávio Bolsonaro, who is running against President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, a leftist. Having watched Mr. Trump wade into other elections and experienced his failed attempt to help Mr. Bolsonaro’s father avoid prison for plotting a coup, Brazil is erecting a firewall to try to shield its high-stakes vote from potential U.S. meddling. The efforts include monitoring foreign lobbying and disinformation, fighting false claims about electoral fraud and enlisting the support of countries in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.... The Trump administration has rejected Brazil’s claims that it is seeking to interfere, even though it tried this summer to send a U.S. delegation to investigate Brazil’s electoral integrity.” The link is a gift link. (Also linked yesterday.)