Marie: For some reason unbeknownst to me, Google is offended by my post today. However, it appears you can click on the October 27 page and opt to read the offensive content, whatever it may be.
The post does not appear to contain any or obscene or blasphemous language other than "Trump." I don't know what's going on.
7 comments:
Google wouldn't let me read the offensive post. Also I was warned that commenting
as Anonymous I won't be able to edit or delete a comment.
I guess it's just another way to hassle old people.
Same here, I can see the picture of Trump from the homepage but I "don't have access" after clicking on today's post.
@Anonymous: Did you try just clicking on the October 27 page? That's what I did, and a notice came up giving me a choice of avoiding the shocking content or reading the page at my own peril.
I wasn't able to duplicate my action, even in another browser, because after I opted in, the October 27 page came up in full, automatically. And it is a long one. Sorry for the difficulties.
Your theory about it's being another way to hassle old people sounds reasonable to me.
It appears Google is protecting me from Marie's morning obscenities, too Too bad. I would prefer to wallow in them.
@RAS: Hmmm. I'm going to try deleting the Trump cartoon, which has "offensive" language in it, and is -- at least in theory -- an offensive premise. However, I embedded the cartoon yesterday, and Google didn't seem to mind. I expect that whatever I do, it will take Google a while -- or maybe forever -- to getting around to accepting the page.
SO, I'm going to try deleting the cartoon AND creating October 27, Second Edition, to see if that works.
This is just Google's way of hassling old people.
I got a 403 notice - something like "page not available - that's all we know." Is Google censoring your post? I didn't know they did that.
@Victoria D., et al.: Okay, I just reposted a second edition of the October 27 page. I can read it; whether or not everybody else can, I don't know. I did remove a cartoon I thought could have been the culprit. But that was a shot in the dark; I really don't know what's up.
Post a Comment